IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DMM] FW: dmm - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 109

Uma Chunduri <umac.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 04 December 2020 00:15 UTC

Return-Path: <umac.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734083A10E5 for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 16:15:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mp5w9ZVxI5bi for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 16:15:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2e.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 814C03A10E0 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 16:15:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2e.google.com with SMTP id v92so3773550ybi.4 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 16:15:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zIRohCWc6jeWAwE4d2D3TXGzqCLrGn8EhoqV/L/1OhM=; b=r9raerbeoGKtBR9qn+EFAM/43hOGOz61/BwQmRW9HDyr7HySGGfvCvcEA52NWAlHdv /UHGxFNZ16CF3fDiaLQHwP83LWJx7XvY8FMxmcaWekSc8Y3rxEMAUIkaysob0jMNe0Al +LWv34O3IsrKV6ulIE22hsY4uBmtXrTmTqCEXe0VKVieSVqe7TJSINk95V5/xTSZLBvH nd4Z/X8dtIngtnB2PhONYFoMTBGSFrUlNvaACdSh1cY5kHMHrsqsQtPicFKxD4R+R0rQ Ge8C43r+ckuPVod+xaglsYd7v0wMET8gtE1BdIXVJkWZJhGVj6NMfJHns3AKZhbQsVNl /9Kw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zIRohCWc6jeWAwE4d2D3TXGzqCLrGn8EhoqV/L/1OhM=; b=jzOphjX7Ah82Ay2myVWFvV3gemIF7eM7crcvaf785TF/dSYg+LjJCzO5JD06I1xLvN IRi7sRzqLc9sECAlIQL0mO/j/4LfNuD33jvuKkFuEPIMnTrgdZ7Ow6w2EWx57zdGcwy7 Rg4oK5dtm5G5TzZLf1igbBl+1bmpC/R5dj9z6A5zoIDbzesCejatc+Yl8K7fd5fCC1oJ ww5eS7goxkuoptzJOEs9LDmMS7sfi0V9N2urqMtuweBzdj7gkxL/1vtlY6vs4W0Apdap rU2Kv/SpX4sX9vzXRdCJZZZ7/c9rFZUU5GY6ABgeYpmDb4HcxbVNggOo4U0W04Yosujr 79Vw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532bgyRlNLhNPNSYq52edXAI1qBfbHC8XYyOktMzslYqNUAlWlzZ eGVtjThp5SMdWLyzULn6ugvfLqHOnz/pMIoeQZlIsZggiTE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyZZPQ+sMaty+9LRBdLM3V1PYoMn/PZ+vYKIjpRtNe74QFboqNZvhNRhha1awx8WzZLQY48P9BzFB/Sn22rKOE=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:aaa1:: with SMTP id t30mr2389434ybi.265.1607040904750; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 16:15:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <39BB2EC8-750D-4EFA-950D-C2A6E80D59D7@cisco.com> <1BEC9E20-6039-48FE-A15C-656883F476FB@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <1BEC9E20-6039-48FE-A15C-656883F476FB@cisco.com>
From: Uma Chunduri <umac.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 16:15:12 -0800
Message-ID: <CAF18ct4eMPvmwdC81YJxY7fU662hion3WDmSn2wjpeY3LH-yjw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: dmm <dmm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000044699b05b5985e2b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/6ue3azj9jT7YEAGgkLsuhHqCclQ>
Subject: Re: [DMM] FW: dmm - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 109
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 00:15:08 -0000

Dear Sri & WG

Thx Pable for the minutes and they look good to me.

I just want to further elaborate on some of my reposses:

a. Keeping the MTNC-ID in the packet header creates complications for L2
(mid/backhaul) and V4 (backhaul) only scenarios. This was discussed in
IETF105 presentation (issue/discussion) and IETF106 presentation with
various options before settling on to the current approach. I standby on my
response to Pablo's question and the aspect mostly de-associated now.

b. Most of this work is orthogonal to overarching and generic slicing
effort in routing WGs (including various YANG models). The scope of this
document is much narrow and in the mobility domain and section 3 is mostly
applicable to the framework proposed, for GTP-based UDP encap environments,
currently used in N3 and N9 interfaces.
As I said we would continue to take comments to address further, if any
suggestions/proposals.


Many thx for your feedback/comments.

--
Uma C.


On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 5:00 PM Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <sgundave=
40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Thanks Pablo for taking capturing the meeting minutes.
>
>
>
> https://codimd.ietf.org/notes-ietf-109-dmm#
>
>
>
> WG -  Please review
>
>
>
> Sri
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *dmm <dmm-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "Sri Gundavelli
> (sgundave)" <sgundave=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> *Date: *Friday, November 13, 2020 at 7:00 AM
> *To: *dmm <dmm@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *[DMM] FW: dmm - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF
> 109
>
>
>
> Please review the agenda for IETF 109.
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/109/materials/agenda-109-dmm-00.txt
>
>
>
> Satoru & Sri
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> dmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email