Re: [DMM] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com> Fri, 24 March 2017 17:30 UTC

Return-Path: <sgundave@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3021E12978B; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:30:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SI88qAuVyjO2; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AFD91201F2; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6219; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1490376635; x=1491586235; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=pA8Ywx523J28rM34+aCQU3/oNYJ5SZyUeTFG2buVVlg=; b=T4wxU7TU3DdhSAM4WBzOuFKwTQrIcvgN1qPEkkOS89UgdCukad99Tayt AZQppK6/Kjklnh6C5jtRryTKTUlFB0eScsZJ2E4TjJqolluYK6RVpmA22 iPa1AE15LA2rUyS7WpOMr8Hne5UYRwXqhERg1Bj/i2jFNuJQQeC1UgOvS g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A6AQBCVtVY/5NdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgm5mgWwHjWqRTogWiAODIYIPgg6GIgKDKT8YAQIBAQEBAQEBax0LhRUBAQEBA24LEAIBCBEDAQIoByERFAkIAgQOBYlvAxWsTCuHBQ2DBwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR2GToRvglGCI4VFBZwfOgGKI4NxhDaBfIUqigqKbYh3AR84gQRZFUGEWB0ZgUp1iGGBDQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,215,1486425600"; d="scan'208,217";a="214084382"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Mar 2017 17:30:34 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com (xch-rcd-006.cisco.com [173.37.102.16]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v2OHUY8k000659 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Mar 2017 17:30:34 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-008.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) by XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com (173.37.102.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 12:30:33 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-008.cisco.com ([173.36.7.18]) by XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com ([173.36.7.18]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 12:30:33 -0500
From: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com>
To: "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org>
CC: "dmm-chairs@ietf.org" <dmm-chairs@ietf.org>, Hakima Chaouchi <hakima.chaouchi@telecom-sudparis.eu>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>, Charlie Perkins <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>
Thread-Topic: [DMM] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHSpMRXFXx0BGEg8EaH6QvywrXlTA==
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 17:30:33 +0000
Message-ID: <D4FAA516.2647F0%sgundave@cisco.com>
References: <148720843433.31432.10415791688976362439.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <8a2e5094-228e-2848-7f6c-a911d3375291@earthlink.net> <23654D3D-2040-486B-A89C-60C80167BAB0@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <23654D3D-2040-486B-A89C-60C80167BAB0@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.1.161129
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.32.246.213]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D4FAA5162647F0sgundaveciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/Gi0hbZnfn47yqX5ZLQCW9L8D9jQ>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 17:30:38 -0000

Folks,

Please provide feedback on the following thread.

Request for MN-Id based on other access technology specific identifiers was initially triggered by Hakima Chaouchi; May be Hakima and others can comment on this.

Sri




From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com<mailto:suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>>
Date: Monday, March 13, 2017 at 8:14 PM
To: Charlie Perkins <charles.perkins@earthlink.net<mailto:charles.perkins@earthlink.net>>
Cc: "dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org>" <dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org>>, "dmm-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:dmm-chairs@ietf.org>" <dmm-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:dmm-chairs@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:alias-bounces@ietf.org>>
Resent-To: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com<mailto:jouni.nospam@gmail.com>>, <maxpassion@gmail.com<mailto:maxpassion@gmail.com>>, Sri Gundavelli <sgundave@cisco.com<mailto:sgundave@cisco.com>>
Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 21:14:56 -0700

Hi all,

On Feb 28, 2017, at 4:32 PM, Charlie Perkins <charles.perkins@earthlink.net<mailto:charles.perkins@earthlink.net>> wrote:


Hello folks,

It has been suggested that the dmm WG members should to provide more support for the inclusion of the MNIDs that are listed in draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04.

In order to resolve this issue, please send discussion to the [dmm] mailing list with thoughts about which of the types proposed in the draft are likely to require considerations about privacy when used in the Mobile Node Identifier option.  Also, for the proposed types, it has been requested to make some discussion about how their inclusion will help to improve the Internet.

This is a reminder to provide your inputs regarding the MNID types as Charlie has requested.

Thanks
Suresh