[DMM] [Errata Rejected] RFC6275 (5898)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 03 August 2023 11:58 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADF5C16951E; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 04:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.865
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.865 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ab_GN6eQ6cRz; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 04:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (unknown [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B763C15107F; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 04:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 46F9D3E8A6; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 04:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
To: furry13@gmail.com, charliep@computer.org, dbj@cs.rice.edu, jari.arkko@ericsson.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: evyncke@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org, dmm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20230803115836.46F9D3E8A6@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2023 04:58:36 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/M07euayP0JTVNtkeQ38QobiIcnk>
Subject: [DMM] [Errata Rejected] RFC6275 (5898)
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2023 11:58:40 -0000
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6275, "Mobility Support in IPv6". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5898 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2019-11-08 Rejected by: Eric Vyncke (IESG) Section: GLOBAL Original Text ------------- Corrected Text -------------- It should say: Updates: 4861 [in RFC header] Notes ----- RFC4861 Section 6.2.1 says that "MaxRtrAdvInterval ..MUST be no less than 4 seconds" and "MinRtrAdvInterval...MUST MUST be no less than 3 seconds" RFC6275 Section 7.5. changes those requirements to: "Routers supporting mobility SHOULD be able to be configured with a smaller MinRtrAdvInterval value and MaxRtrAdvInterval value to allow sending of unsolicited multicast Router Advertisements more often. The minimum allowed values are: o MinRtrAdvInterval 0.03 seconds o MaxRtrAdvInterval 0.07 seconds " so it should be flagged as a formal update to RFC4861. --VERIFIER NOTES-- Deviation from RFC 4861 are allowed by its section 6.2.1: " The default values for some of the variables listed below may be overridden by specific documents that describe how IPv6 operates over different link layers." -------------------------------------- RFC6275 (draft-ietf-mext-rfc3775bis-13) -------------------------------------- Title : Mobility Support in IPv6 Publication Date : July 2011 Author(s) : C. Perkins, Ed., D. Johnson, J. Arkko Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Mobility EXTensions for IPv6 Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [DMM] [Errata Rejected] RFC6275 (5898) RFC Errata System