Re: [DMM] Architecture Discussion on SRv6 Mobile User plane

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Fri, 07 May 2021 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 210CC3A2452 for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 May 2021 07:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mKnNUj8jYpjR for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 May 2021 07:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 274413A2450 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 May 2021 07:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FcCmx6Q0fz6G9w2; Fri, 7 May 2021 07:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1620398465; bh=CYnCxxChfcbd/J6pyIQYyiniKQMJ2vau+liPa3ZaIoc=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=SSeITsSiOxkTfPV3XxkfzAhxRp2PH8JkxDBMgxq+G3YPJibLdIetmLFwpMRo6Ha3P eKmS8s8u+BTQpj/a25qaB6io1xXmk9GnF+zi63i1AJEQOG1gWvrV9/g0Iyd24qUXT9 QXD7AasyvAzWQpHSTV0Lu2cAAxAqxO5PX3iuo1ds=
X-Quarantine-ID: <325Ad6cF9-Ad>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at a2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.128.43] (unknown [50.225.209.66]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FcCmx2mXkz6G9v2; Fri, 7 May 2021 07:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
To: Miya Kohno <miya.kohno@gmail.com>, dmm <dmm@ietf.org>
References: <CAG99temXxkY-p49JZQJQ13tsL990bjD4j2qSKuV5KvNsOgARMw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <9c27eac2-702e-93f7-8a6e-2866580766d5@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 10:41:04 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAG99temXxkY-p49JZQJQ13tsL990bjD4j2qSKuV5KvNsOgARMw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/MC_ZfJm9dmfiKApUNxhpdDCKcJM>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Architecture Discussion on SRv6 Mobile User plane
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 14:41:10 -0000

Without getting into the content, when it comes to whether GTP-U is the 
mechanism for carrying cellular mobile user data, that is a 3GPP 
decision, not an IETF decision.

Yours,
Joel

On 5/7/2021 10:35 AM, Miya Kohno wrote:
> Dear DMM WG,
> 
> Following up the discussion at the IETF110 
> (https://codimd.ietf.org/notes-ietf-110-dmm 
> <https://codimd.ietf.org/notes-ietf-110-dmm>), I would like to have your 
> review on the draft - 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kohno-dmm-srv6mob-arch-04 
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kohno-dmm-srv6mob-arch-04>.
> 
> The purpose of this draft is to support the value of the SRv6 mobile 
> user plane 
> (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-12 
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-12>), 
> and to be a trigger to revisit the current situation where GTP-U is 
> taken for granted as a mobile user plane.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Miya - on behalf of the authors
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> dmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>