IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DMM] Comment made during the session today

Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Mon, 27 March 2017 16:20 UTC

Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71BF412878D for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 09:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=it-uc3m-es.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mm9UG3p7G2Ph for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 09:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x22d.google.com (mail-it0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB29A127201 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 09:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 190so59125858itm.0 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 09:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=it-uc3m-es.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3lxid3I/ynrmK+k8ctcyNyM4+zGZ4BVZdFUB9aJkFTQ=; b=AUt9w3zJPGWgRbc1Z5+tHeXCwNlCacgK60LLX3QBc/ksOfewFJsJD8kSvMKVdb8c/T 0fcZYxLxvO3RRn+3eC1MqeRIF3ZnRMixCmfNNdhR+Z9ZwXldO4b+kgEgSn/hUAGgztis ce368T0O2J5XOCsPymUrqeDCSErUwTlFbDstUJcyg06cih+AlVnROrPe6Hig4/f/7tG1 GyxpDXWU5KCq3OTdB+AdWu1reV+kQ9mdrLUFEclIIh4gcM4TL3YAozuJlnoLq/jYU6m+ LU/Elp7CqoRyh5HXv8GG0IqlSKbV91ItUkpIdkwK9jjDOB7gTi+bL8iGcxhJLpFUgmN4 vAnQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:date :in-reply-to:references:organization:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3lxid3I/ynrmK+k8ctcyNyM4+zGZ4BVZdFUB9aJkFTQ=; b=GcBQ5+gQLOpmOjNZN7+SWfKoNY75i5c/v0bRXY7DipMALlebAGCTPX47D9xyi0IBDx EyRipM+ZK0cFzFKGOOr8sOLlGPnh5Hdr8KsAeCVRtkhVVJUJ0s9zQoT+FTeFJlTBFrT1 4RNNs7n+bXwPbEMPR2EaAe0OGCLAsNK0OYfH/RmOL2wpHpem11bkGaU6vKKXObKlVd8O h1vMa4FsjrH6WaiWHBBSC8sjK3urPRWiOBRCk2/O+gPSAlqxAb0sokSQeAHSAnVRa8RM 8iY9UCqBGTf7juVkC8OtjiSFT2AhKEjM3rJWwe5kRMRqX1h46ZfJb5+jMvgQLc7+j/84 wG0w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2x76FccqKkPr/OK/WUbzbAzWs84KYv/wSTHDQcRB5ljsUDf91qNS+y9SGAbQ/XQliV
X-Received: by 10.36.89.209 with SMTP id p200mr9943522itb.59.1490631647753; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 09:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from t2001067c03700128f810ee7ee10fff77.v6.meeting.ietf.org (t2001067c03700128f810ee7ee10fff77.v6.meeting.ietf.org. [2001:67c:370:128:f810:ee7e:e10f:ff77]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 17sm442663ioq.45.2017.03.27.09.20.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 27 Mar 2017 09:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1490631646.27787.43.camel@it.uc3m.es>
From: Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
Reply-To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
To: Jong-Hyouk Lee <jonghyouk@gmail.com>
Cc: "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 18:20:46 +0200
In-Reply-To: <53A9E6C4-3E78-4950-B227-90C5F8B35346@gmail.com>
References: <1490630736.27787.42.camel@it.uc3m.es> <53A9E6C4-3E78-4950-B227-90C5F8B35346@gmail.com>
Organization: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.5-1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/UeiMYP6MW5w6ZvAb5Er-2P3tWOM>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Comment made during the session today
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:20:52 -0000

That there's been work done on the same topic before (I was just
pointing to a paper we published).

Carlos

On Tue, 2017-03-28 at 01:18 +0900, Jong-Hyouk Lee wrote:
> Hi, Carlos
> 
> What was your comment on the draft? 
> 
> J.
> --
> Jong-Hyouk Lee, living somewhere between /dev/null and /dev/random
> Protocol Engineering Lab., Sangmyung University
> 
> #email: jonghyouk@gmail.com
> #webpage: https://sites.google.com/site/hurryon
> 
> > On Mar 28, 2017, at 01:05, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3
> > m.es> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Regarding the comment I made related to draft-yan-dmm-man-00, this
> > is
> > the paper I've mentioned:
> > 
> > "The costs and benefits of combining different IP mobility
> > standards"
> > Antonio de la Oliva, Ignacio Soto, María Calderón, Carlos J.
> > Bernardos
> > and M. Isabel Sanchez
> > Computer Standards and Interfaces, Volume 35, no. 2, Pages: 205-
> > 217,
> > Feb. 2013
> > 
> > http://www.it.uc3m.es/cjbc/papers/pdf/2013_delaoliva_csi_costs.pdf
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Carlos
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > dmm mailing list
> > dmm@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email