Re: [DMM] 6.6. T.M.GTP4.D description (Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-05.txt

Kentaro Ebisawa <ebiken.g@gmail.com> Tue, 09 July 2019 04:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ebiken.g@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D59712024E for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 21:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PDS_NO_HELO_DNS=1.295, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3PUQTjlC6Fi9 for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 21:02:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com (mail-ed1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::532]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9544312023F for <dmm@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 21:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id w20so16386474edd.2 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 21:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Be4CAhgHayLUB/BvFrEibku3keIfQUFUoCfFNIpDAPk=; b=djtRN1FAFwl4OdHMM0JU/7/X5TzYonM7y38ASxTuSG85HbXBwjCJh3eq57yywX2cTq KLwQo18wx1P4ReWJiZO0K0nEXKLZMHG2YLaNKdozSXsGCqkdFR3Veyssw52oF2FFkb88 o36xyHl0T4PX8I4LMI5lKSIAAr1w7EVIRwX72chFgQk9sbch8MLOcWnl3rbh0IzosurX DRpdeUjGnb9XTs9jRghMFxShBXxs5teJ21L8Q5BK3mgoSwnG+Sh/iNb1ZN5KDgRWetbW QRYp3nTlC48lJJjmAiM7IJq8EUFY+K6DbAH1ikLt8/tjcc+cg8fiaS118kjXC7jMi7M+ m+SA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Be4CAhgHayLUB/BvFrEibku3keIfQUFUoCfFNIpDAPk=; b=KAj4QcXnaD8zgjUTUaD+oe+qQWOH5d+JKkJIguJZWkQXVwmnrPCO0T+7312SukqM16 nBG+IL9eXG7pmdaWs8oA6RWuk9b15MPpBzKNsfC5jJpUlR2OZXk7nXtWjQozOwj7U14J ageI46aTWTGDG//f37tLE9PnW7r0Db8PXMx2BXhf+T7chg7OuJH+RIG08C1rJzu4h1WZ lau9Jr1SjcA28yFPRJV+9nIUM/JWbeHumpG3D60APg7ZcK3KETPF/8Qx7+zyUh+hC34B UCpBN+BPaOUb8NoeExXtVAmDJ17B0xXqAma90868JsidNcAFB1ZUG8icstCH5DBjFVJB /XBA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW6jpm0xRES0ATDk6tjl9WDlr45yym8Va+An+xBgZJWkjYzlmHv yIsGfLI8oUU8A6e3L9VFR9eSCpZwyt7L9NHoHGY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqywts67tcJ3n22ASrUy0zASwMJQjiny0gUING4Jnw8FwRVj0fhyl2IS0uKIukKgUSXlwwtNqaf4VZqzELhIasE=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:94a2:: with SMTP id s31mr23796207eda.290.1562644945014; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 21:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156258816746.872.1838108292625193258@ietfa.amsl.com> <em4f0a96e3-6ef0-45d4-ae9f-5ef94fd65664@ebiken-desktop> <0F596A5C-ACF4-4E7B-9E6D-BC71722C4D68@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0F596A5C-ACF4-4E7B-9E6D-BC71722C4D68@gmail.com>
From: Kentaro Ebisawa <ebiken.g@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 13:02:17 +0900
Message-ID: <CAEQxF6WO4G_XWHtXY+E=j1Dd+uO2OcHF5dGACs-qGWet8q3jVA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
Cc: dmm <dmm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000db929c058d37a0d8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/Vaq2820q3ORxSq5Kcc4_7eF_gUQ>
Subject: Re: [DMM] 6.6. T.M.GTP4.D description (Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-05.txt
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 04:02:29 -0000

> Actually no, because it is assumed that the prefix of B’ could be a SID
for End.GTP4.E instantiated in SRGW. But you’re correct the B’ doesn’t need
to be filled with arg.mob.session.

So the assumption here is that both T.M.GTP4.D and End.M.GTP4.E are
instantiated on the same SRGW.
If that's what you intend,  considering B' doesn't need arg.mob.session, it
might be more natural to say like below, since the source IPv6 of the
packet translated by T.M.GTP4.D corresponds to S' mentioned in 6.5.
End.M.GTP4.E.
(And since GTP-U is uni-directional, T.M.GTP4.D and End.M.GTP4.E might not
be instantiated on the same SRGW. e.g. for scaling purpose)

If End.M.GTP4.E is also instantiated on the SR gateway, the Source UPF
Prefix of B' SHOULD be SRGW-IPv6-LOC-FUNC of End.M.GTP4.E SID
instantiated on the SR gateway.


Just my two cents.
-- 
Kentaro Ebisawa <ebiken.g@gmail.com>


On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:50 PM Satoru Matsushima <
satoru.matsushima@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Kentaro for you prompt review prior to my announce. :-)
>
> Thank you for updating the draft. Nice to see T.M.Tmap was renamed to
> T.M.GTP4.D corresponding to End.M.GTP4.E. :)
>
>
> It helps to improve consistency of the draft, thanks.
>
> Some feedback about the updated description.
>
> > 6.6. T.M.GTP4.D
> > ...
> > The prefix of B’ SHOULD be an End.M.GTP4.E SID with its format
> > instantiated at an SR gateway with the IPv4 SA of the receiving
> > packet.
>
> "The B’" is IPv6 SA so I think this should correspond to S' in
> End.M.GTP4.E rather than to SID.
>
>
> Actually no, because it is assumed that the prefix of B’ could be a SID
> for End.GTP4.E instantiated in SRGW. But you’re correct the B’ doesn’t need
> to be filled with arg.mob.session.
>
> Cheers,
> --satoru
>
> So it might be more clear to depict the packet format (diagram) again and
> mention B' has the following format with the IPv4 SA of the receiving
> packet.
>
> 0                                                         127
> +----------------------+--------+--------------------------+
> | Source UPF Prefix    |IPv4 SA | any bit pattern(ignored) |
> +----------------------+--------+--------------------------+
>        128-a-b             a                 b
>
> --
> Kentaro Ebisawa <ebiken.g@gmail.com>
>
> ------ Original Message ------
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: dmm@ietf.org
> Sent: 2019/07/08 21:16:07
> Subject: [DMM] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-05.txt
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Distributed Mobility Management WG of the
> IETF.
>
>        Title           : Segment Routing IPv6 for Mobile User Plane
>        Authors         : Satoru Matsushima
>                          Clarence Filsfils
>                          Miya Kohno
>                          Pablo Camarillo
>                          Daniel Voyer
>                          Charles E. Perkins
> Filename        : draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-05.txt
> Pages           : 28
> Date            : 2019-07-08
>
> Abstract:
>   This document shows the applicability of SRv6 (Segment Routing IPv6)
>   to the user-plane of mobile networks.  The network programming nature
>   of SRv6 accomplish mobile user-plane functions in a simple manner.
>   The statelessness of SRv6 and its ability to control both service
>   layer path and underlying transport can be beneficial to the mobile
>   user-plane, providing flexibility, end-to-end network slicing and SLA
>   control for various applications.  This document describes the SRv6
>   mobile user plane behavior and defines the SID functions for that.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-05
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-05
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-05
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> dmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> dmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>
>