IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DMM] User Plane Protocol Study in 3GPP

Arashmid Akhavain <arashmid.akhavain@huawei.com> Wed, 30 May 2018 18:57 UTC

Return-Path: <arashmid.akhavain@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5F1120724 for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 May 2018 11:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iatWPPBrF7dU for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 May 2018 11:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2BB21270AE for <dmm@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 May 2018 11:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LHREML714-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 895E9366ED1E0 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 May 2018 19:57:19 +0100 (IST)
Received: from YYZEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.218.33.73) by LHREML714-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.382.0; Wed, 30 May 2018 19:57:21 +0100
Received: from YYZEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.97]) by YYZEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.179]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Wed, 30 May 2018 14:57:14 -0400
From: Arashmid Akhavain <arashmid.akhavain@huawei.com>
To: Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@huawei.com>, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>, Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
CC: dmm <dmm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [DMM] User Plane Protocol Study in 3GPP
Thread-Index: AQHTwGu3KCzqWEVQj0G5thzVkVMN9aPZ1QwAgAAO9QCAAARLAIAAW8YAgGOo8/CACx7kYA==
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 18:57:13 +0000
Message-ID: <D57109449177B54F8B9C093953AC5BCD74B83A76@YYZEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com>
References: <CAC5bAibwUoL2ALGmec_squw85VYbvdNLxkHSkW4AwGVhmnz6NA@mail.gmail.com> <10C371AF-8B94-4FDD-B26B-A915CC49CAB5@gmail.com> <A959D36A-B34A-4032-87BF-DA0284321A27@gmail.com> <F279A773-BE3D-4DAB-9AF5-D544A3202FAC@gmail.com> <736997CE-F6D6-4716-99BB-8D41199A8997@gmail.com> <25B4902B1192E84696414485F57268541358FB5C@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <25B4902B1192E84696414485F57268541358FB5C@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.193.61.47]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/dX_eAYcDYhrklh1NGJD9M6uhubg>
Subject: Re: [DMM] User Plane Protocol Study in 3GPP
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 18:57:26 -0000

You are right Uma,

Any deployment scenario (aside from green-field) will involve a combination of both address types.
IPv4 will be the dominant type at first while IPv6 gets introduced gradually.
Any mobility solution must address migration. Blank canvas is a nonstarter for operators.

Arashmid




> -----Original Message-----
> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Uma Chunduri
> Sent: 23 May 2018 13:08
> To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>; Satoru Matsushima
> <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
> Cc: dmm <dmm@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [DMM] User Plane Protocol Study in 3GPP
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> For the Dino's question -
> 
> > Do you think carriers will build an IPv6-only NGC at this point in time?
> 
> I don't think so (from the existing deployments perspective, including early
> 5G transitions).
> 
> So, IMO - any mobility solution ought to be underlay independent - to allow
> flexibility for the operators. I see this discussion is independent of address
> space exhaustion or IPv6 address to UE..
> 
> --
> Uma C.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dino Farinacci
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 5:02 PM
> To: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
> Cc: dmm <dmm@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [DMM] User Plane Protocol Study in 3GPP
> 
> That sounds like you want to do IPv4 over IPv6. Do you think carriers will
> build an IPv6-only NGC at this point in time?
> 
> Dino
> 
> > On Mar 20, 2018, at 6:33 PM, Satoru Matsushima
> <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Next header type maybe?
> > Interestingly GTP-U doesn’t have it.
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > 2018/03/20 18:17、Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>のメール:
> >
> >> How? Please summarize in one sentence and don’t me to a draft.
> >>
> >> Dino
> >>
> >>> On Mar 20, 2018, at 10:24 AM, Satoru Matsushima
> <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Yes , supports IPv4 PDU with minimum effort.
> >>>
> >>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>
> >>> 2018/03/20 16:47、Lyle Bertz <lyleb551144@gmail.com>のメール:
> >>>
> >>>> I did not get to ask but I know your presentation talks about IPv6 but is
> there a requirement to support IPv4 mobile or dual stack?
> >>>>
> >>>> Lyle
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> dmm mailing list
> >>> dmm@ietf.org
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
> >>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> dmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> dmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email