Re: [DMM] Call for adoption: draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-01

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Sat, 25 April 2015 12:14 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CF61A1A00 for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 05:14:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.983
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.983 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vyUQNKwuaxUS for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 05:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 265181A19F6 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 05:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.3) with ESMTP id t3PCEF2I024710; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 14:14:15 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 026C7200FB9; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 14:15:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B05200F3E; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 14:15:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([132.166.84.67]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.2) with ESMTP id t3PCDQYq026131; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 14:13:44 +0200
Message-ID: <553B84E6.8050001@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 14:13:26 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sarikaya@ieee.org
References: <551C0877.1060100@gmail.com> <552F4165.9020300@gmail.com> <5536AB1E.6060507@gmail.com> <CAC8QAcc6mDoBC6x9QJPsyrSv092Kv5b+LZCUgy_mFzJjk0OTFA@mail.gmail.com> <5537D047.5040502@gmail.com> <CAC8QAce+EQWWEc1PwE9sEOhsvMPS8kEGAd9g=av6swHYMUba-Q@mail.gmail.com> <5539FE54.2030103@gmail.com> <CAC8QAcf_WyHWF1GY9m9fsaQPMT0_eH5MsRyo9Fzm9jppZJ2PPg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAcf_WyHWF1GY9m9fsaQPMT0_eH5MsRyo9Fzm9jppZJ2PPg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/eMtHVaopP3E0WyiDQjFH0hjMt38>
Cc: sofiane.imadali@gmail.com, Basavaraj Patil <bpatil1@gmail.com>, "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption: draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-01
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 12:14:21 -0000

Le 24/04/2015 21:30, Behcet Sarikaya a écrit :
[...]
>> When the car arrives home it connects to the WiFi available in
>> home, thus handing over from LTE.  This is a sold use-case at e.g.
>> Tesla.  The WiFi hotspot can be the one deployed in-house,
>> in-garage, or the WiFi offered by the electrical recharging
>> stations.
>>
>
> Even if the is the case then 3GPP developed a lot of things on
> accessing non-3GPP networks like Wi-Fi. I think line-id is used
> instead of IMSI?

I dont know.  Maybe line-id should be suggested as an MN-ID as well.

But I can tell that vehicles will not always use the 3GPP-defined means 
to connect to WiFi.  And the WiFi operator is different than the 3GPP 
operator, and thus a different MN-ID form.

The MN-ID that I consider in vehicles is the one used for Mobile IP. 
3GPP deployments I confront with dont use Mobile IP.

Mobile IP offers a mobility solution completely independent of the 
access networks.

Alex

>
> Behcet
>> Other manufacturers propose scenarios in which car's WiFi antenna
>> switches from being an in-car hotspot to being a Client to outside
>> wifi.
>>
>> Some consider 802.11p (wifi for vehicles) to be deployed along
>> highways and cars to perform handovers between these 802.11p
>> access points.
>>
>> Next time on highway scan for WiFi - one is surprised by the
>> number of hotspots driving around, even though often they use
>> portals.
>>
>> There are many commercially considered scenarios involving WiFi
>> handovers for cars.
>>
>> Alex
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Behcet
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Newer models will feature IPv6 in addition to IPv4, WiFi
>>>> handover from LTE to house's hotspot, continuous sessions, and
>>>> over-the-air software update for cheap upgradeability to
>>>> future generation 5G and beyond.
>>>>
>>>> In this context it is hard to imagine IMSI will be there for a
>>>> long time in a given car, and a more permanent identifier is
>>>> needed.
>>>>
>>>> To Raj - is LTE considering other kinds of identifiers for
>>>> access control (other than IMSI) for vehicular environments,
>>>> like V2X?
>>>>
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Behcet
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yours,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Jouni & Dapeng
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 4/1/2015, 8:02 AM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This emails starts a two week call for the I-D
>>>>>>>> draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-01 to confirm the
>>>>>>>> aadoption s a DMM WG document. The call ends April 15th
>>>>>>>> EOB PST.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Express your support or opposition to the mailing
>>>>>>>> list. During the IETF92 meeting we got 7 voices for
>>>>>>>> the adoption so at least the same amount supporting
>>>>>>>> emails should be expected.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Jouni & Dapeng
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ dmm
>>>>>>> mailing list dmm@ietf.org
>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________ dmm
>>>>>> mailing list dmm@ietf.org
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>