IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02 as DMM WG document

Kiran.Makhijani <Kiran.Makhijani@huawei.com> Fri, 23 November 2018 23:03 UTC

Return-Path: <Kiran.Makhijani@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9158D128AFB for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 15:03:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7VGAcMYpcwDl for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 15:03:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5298130DC9 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 15:03:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 4B907564D7B0B for <dmm@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 23:03:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.38) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 23:03:31 +0000
Received: from SJCEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.160]) by SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.63]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 15:03:29 -0800
From: "Kiran.Makhijani" <Kiran.Makhijani@huawei.com>
To: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>, "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com>
CC: "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02 as DMM WG document
Thread-Index: AQHUe7HFMcb38LOZ1Ua10cQrCgYjiqVag3sAgACH+wCAAv6jAA==
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 23:03:28 +0000
Message-ID: <A0E773F8-0505-4989-8AE3-400E87636856@huawei.com>
References: <D810AD85.2CFD7%sgundave@cisco.com> <CAHx=1M533r1QomT=g6tR5gpOdQku-PDJA-RfoPah-uM=rppw4Q@mail.gmail.com> <E5A7F989-A349-4364-9E62-966008486DC1@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <E5A7F989-A349-4364-9E62-966008486DC1@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.212.246.65]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A0E773F8050549898AE3400E87636856huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/gJ_Na-diYjzBmVzfPe8LtgUrdS8>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02 as DMM WG document
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 23:03:38 -0000

Support. The document is certainly very useful.
But I hope to see some restructuring, perhaps as a problem-statement document to make it IETF-relevant (or aligned) and sets background reference for future work in DMM.

-Kiran

From: dmm <dmm-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
Date: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 at 9:20 AM
To: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com>
Cc: "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02 as DMM WG document

+1, I find this document very useful for the WG to take and complete.

Thanks

Regards … Zafar


On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 1:34 AM Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <sgundave@cisco.com<mailto:sgundave@cisco.com>> wrote:
Folks:

During IETF 102 and 103, the authors of the document, draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis.txt have provided the overview of this document. The chairs felt there is good amount of work that went into the document and the analysis has value. The document quality is very high. There was also generally good feedback and interest for the work from the community. We are therefore considering adopting this document as a DMM WG document, to be moved on Informational Standards track.

There were also few concerns/comments on the 1.) Relevance of this document to 3GPP in the immediate time frame 2.) Archival Value of the document 3.) Target Audience  - IETF or 3GPP.
On #3, there was also a view that the document should be restructured to make it IETF focussed.  With this background, we would like to ask the WG to provide some feedback on their interest for this work. Please provide substantial comments as why this should be adopted, or why it should not be adopted. If there is interest, and if there are no other concerns from AD/IESG/Others, then we may take up this work at some point.

Draft Pointer: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02


The adoption call will end on 4th of December, 2019.

Regards
Dapping & Sri
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email