Re: [DMM] Is IPv6 UDP checksum deployment impact an input to 3GPP?

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Thu, 19 October 2023 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C91C180DDB for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 09:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.855
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.855 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UQzyH3MiP-tS for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 09:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92b.google.com (mail-ua1-x92b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5FD6C1AE9E8 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 09:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92b.google.com with SMTP id a1e0cc1a2514c-7b610279c8aso3815079241.3 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 09:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1697732765; x=1698337565; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WIwrTKx7/ka579STLXKJ0AovXVy6YUDdxXdcooI0PWk=; b=LKMjb2dwN2GRGL7gf2DSaUdiVQin7Arz1mxDD5CddY+UuICOS8OsBflXcF8FfjLE7Z yyVpf0JIQWOpAMsVTG7cz+MfaI19cqC8KT+FkmraQCHJkoR9iIWY3M8CiW61ekm+Apig KcDALSmYnZLidJfNYwVoxR1zrvQcgzrGiceD9ZjZceuvHTgnEXii0exh4a2pBRtcjzDd kiGU6knq1EK+ZcR6KwNzT98H9BQX4uuzNUO5n5fPrr95/A1rPs5vAqDtloIhQFipD20c 6magMtBnJbn1YOzWPTfyxduYul6++uOmI074pKtg+yIGWKKhqnJERiBdKrJeXJvVBcEw VrVA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1697732765; x=1698337565; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=WIwrTKx7/ka579STLXKJ0AovXVy6YUDdxXdcooI0PWk=; b=mvLuoOHjtLzsGWTeBukikaV/KYy+AwTT2Zd5cwkNp2f/LEAZsfgmuCwuIxea1ti6dU YImizPRMITX8ONyIPRgjm2Y3XAeIZU6yuWJLGYj+3EFBZeWIPaR4E1YJm1wyGqP1Vejs yH3E2GHLYP1TuiOkA6ml/uLpTDzX95yWycg8otSB1Fi/lbCumk1uHRTB6/nrflPXKhv9 O6EczCtZCS2fqe3cDRmk9ZKdgxtpBjHkKdZfUG381PXIfdhfASi3CX7zfoLyL3Jm43di nox581Zru4dR7zO2A+H5J7e8PcvCiW6VUudiK9lRiPVkIKerS7OS74JsLLc7CYVpufT0 aifw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyLxBOT/PeEhAzkGwvz111p8a7EfJvFdGghKss7NKgdCXV5GhfW DxRrBApi45aPlTPDvs5AEWqIMwrVs1UN9k4FusgqIpC7xIg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGrmm7XwrvqP5GO2qD+VHsNI8OYQl4TrKSxVb3wqfz7viusJyK0k7TIgbGvLCedA2gTGu7FbiCZ9ESs0a+SqBY=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:e1cd:0:b0:452:7748:4700 with SMTP id p13-20020a67e1cd000000b0045277484700mr2291170vsl.2.1697732765539; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 09:26:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFwJXX5yypryuTHX_0gH0VhkG68JE=owdhPEw2V0mvMcNqCRgw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFwJXX5yypryuTHX_0gH0VhkG68JE=owdhPEw2V0mvMcNqCRgw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 11:25:54 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcd=3+CaU6Fh5Y1bv-zL76PnP7TFchctbg+bzroLA5GV5w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
Cc: dmm <dmm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000069e3e40608143640"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/mVxXkANSckyPZyedAtdf3xxt5oM>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Is IPv6 UDP checksum deployment impact an input to 3GPP?
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 16:26:10 -0000

Hi Satoru,

I read your mail and have a few points to raise (BTW, all friendly, you and
I know each other since long time, and no offence).



On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 4:56 AM Satoru Matsushima <
satoru.matsushima@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear DMMers,
>
> During IETF117 DMM meeting, we had a report of the IPv6 UDP checksum
> deployment impact in the following I-D:
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-murakami-dmm-udp-checksum-impact-gtpu/
>
> In the meeting room, the chairs observed that DMMers were interested in
> this draft as an input to 3GPP.
>
> Please let us know any of your feedback, comments on this draft, and to be
> an input to 3GPP.
>
>
Anybody can take a contribution to 3GPP as input if you belong to a member
company.

I know that Softbank is a member.


Another point, since you are a co-author, it would be better to let this
draft be handled by a co-chair.

Behcet

> Regards,
> -satoru
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> dmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>