Re: [dns-dir] FW: PRELIMINARY Agenda and Package for the August 11, 2011 IESG Teleconference

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 05 August 2011 13:27 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA3B21F8B78 for <dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 06:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.266
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.266 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.333, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gWirhaeHLf2D for <dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 06:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f179.google.com (mail-qy0-f179.google.com [209.85.216.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC5621F8B65 for <dns-dir@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 06:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk35 with SMTP id 35so1474512qyk.10 for <dns-dir@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 06:27:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=Iz+IxPYvC7PMRE54q20eaZUb0bzbQmQHxUnDBkGv7xQ=; b=PKsVnDlDjHJMiKPFLjvcydY0UneeRwzFaP6IW4gxIaa4EZlsexC6XfJWapViksKAjo lfQ7Hley5RCcROF358gsJaA9CNkN7yB7+hH7db6/fC4hqAu9udhqoPQvXIAaMjuFgSVB 753kdoh7jvo815UngQ3sRSbTnK93ZdpZJVxeM=
Received: by 10.224.174.201 with SMTP id u9mr1682499qaz.351.1312550867022; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 06:27:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [161.44.65.173] ([161.44.65.173]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m7sm2106085qct.29.2011.08.05.06.27.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 05 Aug 2011 06:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110805132604.GJ32003@x27.adm.denic.de>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 09:27:43 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B8392AFC-61E1-448E-90A5-43142ECE8465@gmail.com>
References: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0403774FEB@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <20110805132604.GJ32003@x27.adm.denic.de>
To: Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: IETF DNS Directorate <dns-dir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dns-dir] FW: PRELIMINARY Agenda and Package for the August 11, 2011 IESG Teleconference
X-BeenThere: dns-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNS directorate discussion list <dns-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-dir>, <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dns-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-dir>, <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:27:33 -0000

Thanks, Peter.

Coincidentally, I was updating the state of draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-radius-ext-04 this morning.  Do you mind if I enter your review verbatim as a Comment?

- Ralph

On Aug 5, 2011, at 9:26 AM 8/5/11, Peter Koch wrote:

> Dan,
> 
> i've checked the drafts
> 
>>  o draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-lsp-ping-17
>>  o draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsmap-10
>>  o draft-ietf-behave-ftp64-12
>>  o draft-ietf-ccamp-asymm-bw-bidir-lsps-bis-02
>>  o draft-ietf-roll-of0-15
>>  o draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-recurs-fec-04
>>  o draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-radius-ext-04
>>  o draft-ietf-msec-gdoi-update-09
>>  o draft-gutmann-cms-hmac-enc-05
>>  o draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-security-groupkeying-10
>>  o draft-ietf-decade-survey-05
>>  o draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-05
>>  o draft-shiomoto-ccamp-switch-programming-05
>>  o draft-burgin-ipsec-suiteb-profile-01
>>  o draft-law-rfc4869bis-01
>>  o draft-forte-lost-extensions-07
>>  o draft-simpson-isis-ppp-unique-01
> 
> for a few keywords.  draft-ietf-decade-survey-05 mentions the DNS a few
> times, noting to worry about.
> 
> draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-radius-ext-04 has some nits/minor issues:
> 
> o In the introduction, AFTR should be expanded once, before first use
> 
> o I'm not too familiar with RADIUS folklore, so this might be obvious to
>  others, but section 4 does not clearly state which format is used
>  for DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name.  Section 5 later states that
>  "The data type of DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name is a string", but earlier it is suggested
>  that DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name be fed with the data obtained through DHCP in
>  OPTION_AFTR_NAME, which is clarly in DNS wire format.  If this option
>  uses text (presentation) format instead, it would need to say whether it's
>  all ASCII (A-Label) or not (where it is unlikely amnybody intended to
>  use U-Labels).
>  The picture at the top of page 9 suggests the DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name
>  has a fixed length (of 6 octets, for taht matter), so a more open ended
>  graph as used in the RADIUS RFCs might be advised.
> 
> -Peter
> _______________________________________________
> dns-dir mailing list
> dns-dir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-dir