Re: [dns-dir] FW: PRELIMINARY Agenda and Package for October 8, 2009 Telechat

[Olafur Gudmundsson <[e-mail]>]

someone needs to look over these documents:
speermint-requirements 00       13 01       15 02       11
speermint-voip-consolidated-usecases 00       12 06       28 
07       28 08       32 08       32 08       32 09       35 10       34

         Olafur

At 04:37 02/10/2009, you wrote:
>  Please find below the preliminary agenda of the IESG telechat on 10/8.
>Please send your comments, questions and concerns before 10/7 COB.
>
>Thanks and Regards,
>
>Dan
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
>IESG Secretary
>
>
>2.1 WG Submissions
>2.1.1 New Item
>   o draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-resumption-08.txt
>     IKEv2 Session Resumption (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 7
>     Note: Paul Hoffman ([e-mail]) is the document shepherd.
>
>     Token: Pasi Eronen
>   o draft-ietf-mipshop-pfmipv6-09.txt
>     Fast Handovers for Proxy Mobile IPv6 (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 7
>     Note: Vijay Devarapalli ([e-mail]) is the document
>shepherd.
>
>     Token: Jari Arkko
>   o draft-ietf-pmol-sip-perf-metrics-04.txt
>     SIP End-to-End Performance Metrics (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 7
>     Note: Vijay Gurbani is the PROTO-shepherd
>     Token: Dan Romascanu
>   o draft-ietf-dime-diameter-cmd-iana-01.txt
>     Updated IANA Considerations for Diameter Command Code Allocations
>(Proposed
>     Standard) - 4 of 7
>     Note: Victor Fajardo ([e-mail]) is the
>document
>
>     shepherd.
>     Token: Ron Bonica
>   o draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-00.txt
>     Preliminary Evaluation of RFC 1652 for Advancement to Full Standard
>     (Standard) - 5 of 7
>     Note: This draft contains the list of changes planned by the YAM WG
>to
>move
>     RFC 1652 to Full Standard. There is no intention to publish this
>document
>     as an RFC, so IESG should vote on this document as if RFC 1652 is
>advancing
>     to Full Standard.. S Moonesamy <[e-mail]> has agreed
>to
>     serve as the document shepherd, but note that there is no
>shepherding
>
>     write-up for this document.
>     Token: Alexey Melnikov
>   o draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements-03.txt
>     Requirements for OAM in MPLS Transport Networks (Proposed Standard)
>-
>6 of
>     7
>     Note: Loa Andersson ([e-mail]) is the document shepherd.. Note that
>this
>     document is a requirement document, for reasons that have. to do
>with
>
>     referencibility by ITU-T we have opted to put it on the standards
>track.
>     The same decision applies to all MPLS-TP requirement. documents.
>     Token: Adrian Farrel
>   o draft-ietf-mpls-tp-nm-req-05.txt
>     MPLS TP Network Management Requirements (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 7
>
>     Note: Loa Andersson ([e-mail]) is the Document Shepherd.. Note that
>this
>     document is a requirement document. For reasons that. have to do
>with
>how
>     the ITU-T can reference RFCs we have opted to put. it on the
>Standards
>
>     Track.
>     Token: Adrian Farrel
>
>2.1.2 Returning Item
>   o draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-12.txt
>     Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks (Proposed
>Standard) -
>     1 of 2
>     Note: IESG: Please read the Document Shepherd Writeup, we need to
>discuss
>     the "Updates: 793" issue.
>     Token: Lars Eggert
>   o draft-ietf-mboned-lightweight-igmpv3-mldv2-05.txt
>     Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 Protocols (BCP) - 2 of 2
>     Token: Ron Bonica
>
>
>2.2 Individual Submissions
>2.2.1 New Item
>NONE
>2.2.2 Returning Item
>NONE
>
>3. Document Actions
>
>3.1 WG Submissions
>         Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
>reasonable
>         contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
>covers? If
>         not, what changes would make it so?"
>
>3.1.1 New Item
>   o draft-ietf-simple-interdomain-scaling-analysis-08.txt
>     Presence Interdomain Scaling Analysis for SIP/SIMPLE (Informational)
>-
>1 of
>     10
>     Note: Ben Campbell is document shepherd
>     Token: Robert Sparks
>   o draft-ietf-krb-wg-cross-problem-statement-04.txt
>     Problem statement on the cross-realm operation of Kerberos
>(Informational)
>     - 2 of 10
>     Token: Tim Polk
>   o draft-ietf-speermint-requirements-07.txt
>     SPEERMINT Requirements for SIP-based Session Peering (Informational)
>-
>3 of
>     10
>     Token: Cullen Jennings
>   o draft-ietf-speermint-voip-consolidated-usecases-14.txt
>     VoIP SIP Peering Use Cases (Informational) - 4 of 10
>     Token: Cullen Jennings
>   o draft-ietf-roll-home-routing-reqs-08.txt
>     Home Automation Routing Requirements in Low Power and Lossy Networks
>
>     (Informational) - 5 of 10
>     Note: JP Vasseur ([e-mail]) is the document shepherd
>     Token: Adrian Farrel
>   o draft-ietf-msec-tesla-for-alc-norm-08.txt
>     Use of TESLA in the ALC and NORM Protocols (Experimental) - 6 of 10
>     Token: Tim Polk
>   o draft-ietf-rtgwg-lf-conv-frmwk-06.txt
>     A Framework for Loop-free Convergence (Informational) - 7 of 10
>     Token: Ross Callon
>   o draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-framework-12.txt
>     IP Fast Reroute Framework (Informational) - 8 of 10
>     Token: Ross Callon
>   o draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-ipv6-config-02.txt
>     IPv6 Configuration in IKEv2 (Experimental) - 9 of 10
>     Note: Paul Hoffman ([e-mail]) is the document shepherd.
>
>     Token: Tim Polk
>   o draft-ietf-eai-downgraded-display-02.txt
>     Displaying Downgraded Messages for Email Address
>Internationalization
>
>     (Experimental) - 10 of 10
>     Note: Harald Alvestrand agreed to shepherd the document
>     Token: Alexey Melnikov
>
>3.1.2 Returning Item
>NONE
>
>3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
>         Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
>reasonable
>         contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
>covers? If
>         not, what changes would make it so?"
>
>3.2.1 New Item
>   o draft-harkins-emu-eap-pwd-08.txt
>     EAP Authentication Using Only A Password (Informational) - 1 of 2
>     Token: Russ Housley
>   o draft-iana-ipv4-examples-02.txt
>     IPv4 Address Blocks Reserved for Documentation (Informational) - 2
>of
>2
>     Token: Russ Housley
>
>3.2.2 Returning Item
>NONE
>3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor
>         The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
>         found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
>         IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
>         <X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
>         that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
>         not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
>         document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
>         therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
>         approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
>         IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
>         therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
>approval.
>
>         The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
>         the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
>         Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
>         indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
>         document shepherd.
>
>         Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
>         be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the
>document.
>
>
>3.3.1 New Item
>   o draft-keromytis-keynote-x509-02.txt
>     X.509 Key and Signature Encoding for the KeyNote Trust Management
>System
>     (Informational) - 1 of 1
>     Token: Tim Polk
>
>3.3.2 Returning Item
>   o draft-templin-ranger-07.txt
>     Routing and Addressing in Next-Generation EnteRprises (RANGER)
>     (Informational) - 1 of 2
>     Token: Jari Arkko
>   o draft-irtf-mobopts-mmcastv6-ps-08.txt
>     Multicast Mobility in MIPv6: Problem Statement and Brief Survey
>     (Informational) - 2 of 2
>     Note: Rajeev Koodli ([e-mail]) is the document
>shepherd.
>     Token: Jari Arkko
>
>3.3.3 For Action
>   o draft-levy-sip-diversion-10.txt
>     Diversion Indication in SIP (Historic) - 1 of 1
>     Token: Robert Sparks
>
>4. Working Group Actions
>4.1 WG Creation
>4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
>     NONE
>4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
>   o Multipath TCP (mptcp) - 1 of 1
>     Token: Magnus Westerlund
>4.2 WG Rechartering
>4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review
>     NONE
>4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
>   o Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) - 1 of 2
>     Token: Magnus Westerlund
>   o Access Node Control Protocol (ancp) - 2 of 2
>     Token: Ralph Droms
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>dns-dir mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-dir