Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] IETF 104: Call for agenda items

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Wed, 27 February 2019 00:07 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49560130EAB for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 16:07:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZYJn36V1UDvX for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 16:07:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (out.west.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25F7212D827 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 16:07:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-2.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1367.3; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 16:07:05 -0800
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1367.000; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 16:07:04 -0800
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] [dns-privacy] IETF 104: Call for agenda items
Thread-Index: AQHUyfFO5pRd+o07UEquq6GyzfLrVKXzUvWA
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:07:03 +0000
Message-ID: <EB97904F-E976-422A-A5B0-C65DCE1FFCD1@icann.org>
References: <1ea20b3d-7984-233f-f7e7-00c38b98c61e@innovationslab.net>
In-Reply-To: <1ea20b3d-7984-233f-f7e7-00c38b98c61e@innovationslab.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <D28F3CB9C570B447BA0BC553295A106A@pexch112.icann.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/1CxRTfOyAsMAVj_R6BAxuAmqvVo>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] IETF 104: Call for agenda items
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:07:08 -0000

The WG adopted draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op, which was last updated in December. It would be good if that was on the WG agenda, and if we could hear where the authors think they need input from us so we can discuss that before the draft cutoff, or maybe in Prague.

I would love to see draft-bortzmeyer-dprive-rfc7626-bis progress, given the new focus of the larger community on the problems presented by some DoH deployment scenarios. Maybe the WG could discuss adopting that document in the WG meeting.

If people are still interested in opportunistic TLS between recursive and authoritative servers, I can toss together a short draft that touches on some of the ideas from other earlier drafts and that could be discussed in Prague as well.

--Paul Hoffman