IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-huitema-dprive-dnsoquic-00.txt

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Fri, 06 March 2020 15:31 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C2A3A0946 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 07:31:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WsGh7csm-FnG for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 07:30:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppa2.lax.icann.org (ppa2.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7E3C3A0939 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 07:30:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from PFE112-CA-2.pexch112.icann.org (out.west.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.10]) by ppa2.lax.icann.org (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with ESMTPS id 026FUtGA010662 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 6 Mar 2020 15:30:55 GMT
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 07:30:53 -0800
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 07:30:53 -0800
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
CC: "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] [dns-privacy] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-huitema-dprive-dnsoquic-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHV84BYNOh1AWp/jESDPIAlSI3vaKg8N4wA
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 15:30:52 +0000
Message-ID: <8ED568C4-B94B-455B-BC07-591FFCB21229@icann.org>
References: <158346998979.14732.7173381060352492793@ietfa.amsl.com> <8d4e2a1a-358b-b816-f095-3b4dc52b915f@huitema.net>
In-Reply-To: <8d4e2a1a-358b-b816-f095-3b4dc52b915f@huitema.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: Processed
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4FBD9844-3055-4662-AFBF-42AE98B9FD1B"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-03-06_04:2020-03-06, 2020-03-06 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/GfLFyT3D2V-90VCzM6pn81fUZ_Y>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-huitema-dprive-dnsoquic-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 15:31:03 -0000

Thank you for continuing this interesting work. However, a reader might not realize that many other folks would prefer DNS/HTTPS/QUIC until the get all the way to Section 3.4. Also, the title of that section seems a bit unbalanced, given that the text says that people might prefer DNS/HTTPS/QUIC for reasons other than hiding from firewalls.

For a future version of this draft, please consider moving the comparison to DNS/HTTPS/QUIC, and the discussion of not knowing which one folks will prefer, up to the Introduction. That would leave Section 3.4 just about the stated design goal.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email