IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] NS names, was re-evaluation of the draft, was Re: [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-vandijk-dprive-ds-dot-signal-and-pin-00.txt]

Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net> Wed, 10 June 2020 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <woody@pch.net>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B96D3A03FF for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y2FpCJ6sigZo for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pch.net (keriomail.pch.net [206.220.231.84]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BAB83A0598 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Footer: cGNoLm5ldA==
Received: from [10.19.48.14] ([69.166.14.2]) by mail.pch.net (Kerio Connect 9.2.7 patch 3) with ESMTPS (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits)); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:08:21 -0700
From: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
Message-Id: <33FC339B-CB09-4D27-B622-44D247BA75A4@pch.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1DAE8CF1-3C70-4AF9-979E-49419F71F2EA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 17:08:14 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAHPuVdV0xt5THm4OfE9=jrC80OsnuvNowzmbHtSffgZi506bCA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: dns-privacy@ietf.org
To: Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com>
References: <CAHPuVdVJ2_DoPpb5C2ET8kEzvfDHACPNQP-2r__sVTQ76WmL4w@mail.gmail.com> <EF30ADBD-3EFA-4224-8828-C6E019F03887@nohats.ca> <CAHPuVdVB9jFLgTaj6s4Qk9i-Devi4qcnbT57BLvsFAjFnr19YQ@mail.gmail.com> <770C946C-77AE-4D40-A507-2EF3C003D805@pch.net> <CAHPuVdV0xt5THm4OfE9=jrC80OsnuvNowzmbHtSffgZi506bCA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/IHQLxNhugAbrFYhNrz_O9cTIlco>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] NS names, was re-evaluation of the draft, was Re: [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-vandijk-dprive-ds-dot-signal-and-pin-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:08:26 -0000


> On Jun 10, 2020, at 4:50 PM, Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com> wrote:
>> How does this differ from the two already-competing “oblivious DNS” proposals?

> I haven't followed recently. Has a draft been submitted to DPRIVE?

Not to the best of my knowledge, but I am also not following closely.  It seems to be an idea that people are coming up with.  Uh, independently inventing.

> Yes, the collusion risk between the ODNS and RDNS operator is a significant weakness, although I suspect that might be deemed acceptable for many folks.

It seems to be acceptable for folks who choose to shine the TOR spotlight on their packets.  But that doesn’t make it sufficient for something newly-engineered.

                                -Bill

v2.41.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status