IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] Logistics for IETF 109

Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl> Mon, 26 October 2020 22:30 UTC

Return-Path: <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75CC3A1040 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 15:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sZjQJhoPZ110 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 15:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound.soverin.net (outbound.soverin.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:fff0:2d:8::215]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A6523A1036 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 15:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (unknown [10.10.3.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by outbound.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50F066081A; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 22:30:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [159.69.232.138]) by soverin.net
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=soverin; t=1603751420; bh=QXFodaupnVXeeBfXy5HkcbJCBJNXgiaXYFYZ+Q2ucSk=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=P/hL0ku9jqDiC7hJVvxrltFIK7oyza+tQd+76atqIKkSthMq5QWJKQ8h353I5tB5M DsKOzsAYa3EO8bAG59TEpDpT36hBNFT+1bZa2Q0+45suR64NUB7XDss+bSt9Ae5N1V YgJVHo3+f3qqTZVd4khePXAXV3y2xfQ3tbbcizkcpMlUiKSNl/80sodOKp9Uh2nB4G ktj+8Yb79hTRGhnTaubFIBb8eBwU9XIahFtSf9+SorRzFEBGhJUHuf+OLNQ+y98znv HJDnyInVcZSxk8YG/Z+HFL0XBy4wuFBhuLtmqAfDnGlB+tdaK5ShaynqKa1odRvnXv H9rD1Vv5wuTfA==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <96c1660a1c6747109708b256c823829a@verisign.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 23:30:18 +0100
Cc: "brian@innovationslab.net" <brian@innovationslab.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <710BE16A-978E-4266-A347-2D07520EBC21@NLnetLabs.nl>
References: <ba805493-a035-1d7b-3dd0-f3dab99bd3f2@innovationslab.net> <96c1660a1c6747109708b256c823829a@verisign.com>
To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck=40verisign.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/JpiPVgOUqEsALWYTGdpSNnQFW6w>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Logistics for IETF 109
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 22:30:25 -0000

Hi Scott,

> On 26 Oct 2020, at 14:26, Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck=40verisign.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Can we expect an update of ietf-dprive-phase2-requirements prior to the meeting? I submitted a pull request on 1 September that hasn't been acted on. It would be nice to know if that request is acceptable and will be included in the document prior to the discussion, or if I should be prepared to talk to the request during the meeting.
> 

Thanks again for the pull request, your input is very valuable.  The co-authors of ietf-dprive-phase2-requirements have synced via email and the inclusion of your feedback is on my calendar for this week.

We are looking forward to discuss the document with you and the DPRIVE WG in the next weeks up to the IETF 109 meeting.

Best regards,

— Benno

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email