[dns-privacy] DPRIVE over UDP or TCP

🔓Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com> Wed, 22 April 2015 17:15 UTC

Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993E11ACD7F for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CZw0lDfdgoBR for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D10251AD1A6 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=728; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1429722927; x=1430932527; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date: to:mime-version; bh=p7wMOWa0DVL8CwzRtn9aamSCH5qYy+gN7d78q6sS99w=; b=QCoVlDAqmSX/66QQhuhJX20wUIy4HrQKDqru0MJHh0T/N6QL4PEMKw+h GlcG9QOg5uPwmajpxSCnEg3iapM2zhPcLkQe6jfZNSH/n7i9ydm6q5wcb JkWdFhjqSov4Z2elc2nonxQnVWNvDm79PdZ/cIq5RoRICeeoUDrXIqnXq 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AXBQDu1TdV/5NdJa1bgwxSyD6HPEwBAQEBAQGBC4RhijsNqCekWwEKAQEBAQEYBJBYgwGBFgWLSYlzhimHLI4FIoQTHoJ1AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,624,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="6093353"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Apr 2015 17:15:26 +0000
Received: from [10.24.102.72] ([10.24.102.72]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3MHEZ0b008237 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:15:26 GMT
From: 🔓Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <832DC193-6328-42EC-B33A-801FC1731EB0@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:15:25 -0700
To: dns-privacy@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/Sak9a0VXQ3XExF0Y6IcPdSSCLnU>
Subject: [dns-privacy] DPRIVE over UDP or TCP
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:15:39 -0000

During the DPRIVE meeting in Dallas, several questions came up about UDP versus TCP.  We had previously submitted a "DNS over DTLS" document which predated DPRIVE.  We re-submitted the document with a few edits and a filename that makes it easier to find, https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wing-dprive-dnsodtls, diffs at https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-wing-dnsop-dnsodtls-01&url2=draft-wing-dprive-dnsodtls-00

The working group may want to consider the advantages of DNS over DTLS over UDP compared to using TCP:

 * No reliance on operating system support of TCP Fast Open [RFC7413] to achieve same number of round trips.
 * Avoidance of TCP's network head of line blocking.

-d