Re: [dns-privacy] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7858 (5375)

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 23 December 2019 20:44 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845DD12018D for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 12:44:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UtJuir_eB116 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 12:44:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32f.google.com (mail-ot1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B79D1200E3 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 12:44:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id 66so23529911otd.9 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 12:44:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=usJWt0kmciFEwF/YND7mLp0jTdFCyJL7qkMZjlJsbH4=; b=E5YZCeHm6nNfGp+q0epbvLIpcGMYPjK5f0n5XjeyUAGXnLm+HpOrnDKKOTkEICvxvs EgcQP9nwR4wl1Ytz4RN8mTbRR3W31naQiCWVtccAhO9l4efHdD9KaUAH2ydT5tSWLL6/ DExoClkC9OQxtWD1VU+OHO3wRQ/oZwtPQ4LM42idmkdc3emxphNp/+0n8qzC6iFzahVF mQCg/JRJBk+LQoI123GokWJBQIoETzmiJ/wnGlleIzSCpCEOC+TJDcfrCT9yqa4I5jV6 yvvODFB/gHJL/68Rx/mIV/nXdU3xsLPr1KUJq2h8sYF4rM8jrUPs03FCP8DT6ntO1i4W HK6A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=usJWt0kmciFEwF/YND7mLp0jTdFCyJL7qkMZjlJsbH4=; b=XaAqT7DoMLyWKjpsvdOWXe0vDu71I2zeydJ7b0DomwQI6YmLhFVl2lWq0TEorcZ1YS 7dwIka/Hd5yIoKS4BW59ZtvU/mij5rlXjm6TbPunW2dcFHNVg2VOqXl01TRV3/fG1Mf/ DvsR3ECQwkZA0K+hXJuLL9Y5JgxAAf24Qc8Rd3RoQFetlL4cLmN0B/vhsdss75sLPvK1 YJIPB9stHgnKT//fTRavYg2NZwtsuzB5cMbBevEnjYBt49OV4swYX+jjhGRZEzUFD+ub R7BjG3PGkjlL4CQFsrJOpxxrDD3MdHL54SFHBYR7TPz7gAe5x+7puvqIERSircjuuzHx +KAg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW7dzqOHlPK9UuM0+KQqQEo/vidsKfAzPZQQgpNVyjv2Dqi3EbP NAGrb7TYwKex7cIxidF8ioAnPVH2EzmhQBqrXnA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqydls0yOYQXpE484V3kkrK95zZzacnqcZty0Oj5+EiEQPwd5BEe3wY2k81MrknkLMpjc2lSAHPNnVbh98HH5vQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1689:: with SMTP id k9mr35889558otr.311.1577133874733; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 12:44:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20191219130836.C4D11F40709@rfc-editor.org> <c0983b61-79b7-0725-3bd7-ad353b7c4d12@nic.cz> <CAHw9_iJpb0nPvPZbrz9umo+XE8nYwTMjAd9vqsyyy41Kqc0KGw@mail.gmail.com> <e9004462-2091-d46e-cd79-1cd5f9be9ca8@uniregistry.com>
In-Reply-To: <e9004462-2091-d46e-cd79-1cd5f9be9ca8@uniregistry.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 15:44:24 -0500
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+FbX7GkEyTd9Tfxg1Eb0_ceSzSHEst2vzTLm923Nzug3w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Patrick Mevzek <mevzek@uniregistry.com>
Cc: DNS Privacy Working Group <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005de8e1059a6518c6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/VBwM3ptdlVo9u4irPgXi6ad2oqY>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7858 (5375)
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 20:44:37 -0000

I agree with Patrick's comment that the folks from DNScrypt should be the
ones giving us the
guidance here.

Tim
(wearing the hat today, so Warren doesn't have to)

On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 1:01 PM Patrick Mevzek <mevzek@uniregistry.com>
wrote:

> On 23/12/2019 12:54, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
> > W
> > p.s: if it were mine, I'd probably mark it hold for update with a note
> > of "someone should validate this..."
>
> In May 2018, I also reported that the correct one was probably more the
> ..info one than the .org one, because at that time both dnscrypt.org and
> www.dnscrypt.org replied with wrong X.509 certificates.
>
> At least right now both resolves correctly but with different content.
>
> Maybe, people behind DNScrypt project/tools/implemnentations should
> voice which website is the correct one...
>
> --
> Patrick Mevzek
>
> _______________________________________________
> dns-privacy mailing list
> dns-privacy@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
>