IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] Version -02 of draft-ietf-padding-policy

Hugo Maxwell Connery <hmco@env.dtu.dk> Fri, 29 September 2017 07:23 UTC

Return-Path: <hmco@env.dtu.dk>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 378441326ED for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 00:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gBCmZVR1msvR for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 00:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spamfilter4.dtu.dk (spamfilter4.dtu.dk [192.38.80.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DCB71321CB for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 00:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ait-pexedg02.win.dtu.dk (ait-pexedg02.win.dtu.dk [192.38.82.192]) by spamfilter4.dtu.dk with ESMTP id v8T7NNNg016154-v8T7NNNi016154 (version=TLSv1.0 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=CAFAIL); Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:23:24 +0200
Received: from AIT-PEX03MBX08.win.dtu.dk (192.38.82.186) by ait-pexedg02.win.dtu.dk (192.38.82.192) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:23:17 +0200
Received: from ait-pex01mbx01.win.dtu.dk ([169.254.1.185]) by AIT-PEX03MBX08.win.dtu.dk ([169.254.8.21]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:23:23 +0200
From: Hugo Maxwell Connery <hmco@env.dtu.dk>
To: Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at>
CC: "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Version -02 of draft-ietf-padding-policy
Thread-Index: AdM4ZInRJMA8hjhAT7uvHEUEuyq1mAAjudBQ
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 07:23:22 +0000
Message-ID: <6CB05D82CE245B4083BBF3B97E2ED470345C018B@ait-pex01mbx01.win.dtu.dk>
References: <19F54F2956911544A32543B8A9BDE0759905AED2@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at>
In-Reply-To: <19F54F2956911544A32543B8A9BDE0759905AED2@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at>
Accept-Language: en-AU, da-DK, en-US
Content-Language: en-AU
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.38.82.198]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6CB05D82CE245B4083BBF3B97E2ED470345C018Baitpex01mbx01wi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/YFjZbkTvOhqhQXyW7wKQbWJ07Wg>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Version -02 of draft-ietf-padding-policy
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 07:23:35 -0000

Hi Alex,

Thanks so much for adding the Maximal Padding strategy.  The section is clear, the subtitle is humorous, and the final NOT RECOMMENDED gives the strategy its place.

Regards,
  Hugo Connery
--
Head of IT, DTU Environment, http://www.env.dtu.dk
________________________________
From: dns-privacy [dns-privacy-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Alexander Mayrhofer [alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at]
Sent: Thursday, 28 September 2017 16:23
To: dns-privacy@ietf.org
Subject: [dns-privacy] Version -02 of draft-ietf-padding-policy

Hello everyone,


I’ve just posted version -02 of the Padding Policy draft. This version consideres comments from the Prague WG sesson and subsequent mailing list discussions. Specifically, the major changes are:


-          Changed Document status to „Experimental“

-          Added „Maximum Length“ padding strategy

-          Reworded „Block Length“ strategy

-          Added text with RFC2119 language to each strategy

-          Provided justification for the recommended strategy.

Please review and comment. I’m happy to talk about it in Singapore, and i think we should be pretty close to WGLC‘ing it out of our eyes after that :) A review by a native speaker of English would also be appreciated, since i’m pretty sure i’ve sprinkled in a bit of Engrish here and there ;)

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-02

best,
Alex

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email