Re: [dns-privacy] [Add] Draft on the use of multiple recursive resolvers

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Mon, 18 November 2019 22:51 UTC

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAH1iCiqBCEZ6tvV0Fzt+C2xNHehPm9aymQbFryiJir7KpM5VaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:51:42 +0800
Cc: dns-privacy@ietf.org, ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <60E5B91A-68A3-4799-B365-CDF261DAB133@piuha.net>
References: <680390BE-E819-4951-98EE-C77E9C60E495@piuha.net> <CAH1iCiqBCEZ6tvV0Fzt+C2xNHehPm9aymQbFryiJir7KpM5VaA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/YdgoQnvY-uPyMDunkD3kBdGuo8E>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Add] Draft on the use of multiple recursive resolvers
Precedence: list

Brian,

Thanks for your comments.

Focusing on one item:

> Using bind-style syntax, I would imagine something like:

Something like this would definitely be useful. It is important to observe though that there are interactions with the ability to keep things private and excessive round-robining/going-to-alternate. The second bullet in Section 3 talks about this in the draft. With that caveat, having an expressive way to define which resolvers you want to talk to is much needed.

Jari

[dns-privacy] Draft on the use of multiple recurs… Jari Arkko
Re: [dns-privacy] [Add] Draft on the use of multi… Vittorio Bertola
Re: [dns-privacy] [Add] Draft on the use of multi… Brian Dickson
Re: [dns-privacy] Draft on the use of multiple re… Vladimír Čunát
Re: [dns-privacy] Draft on the use of multiple re… Vladimír Čunát
Re: [dns-privacy] [Add] Draft on the use of multi… Jari Arkko