IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Call for agenda items - IETF 112

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Tue, 19 October 2021 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBBFD3A0CD0 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:19:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8PZPxbTOGLDH for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa5.dc.icann.org (ppa5.dc.icann.org [192.0.46.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1B9A3A0CC1 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.6]) by ppa5.dc.icann.org (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with ESMTPS id 19JGJ1pV029082 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:19:01 GMT
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.922.13; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:19:00 -0700
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) with mapi id 15.02.0922.013; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:19:00 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] [dns-privacy] Call for agenda items - IETF 112
Thread-Index: AQHXxQUGvLBZkzVkukaS+6uCNkGnVA==
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:19:00 +0000
Message-ID: <BC53D3D2-BF2C-4A82-873C-C747D4632DF5@icann.org>
References: <259923d7-9ad4-8f02-a334-cf127fe95a02@innovationslab.net> <a492cf94-ed5b-5866-4559-69d264478278@innovationslab.net>
In-Reply-To: <a492cf94-ed5b-5866-4559-69d264478278@innovationslab.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: Processed
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DBAE8F1D-E001-487B-A67D-0AC9E155BB94"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-10-19_02:2021-10-18, 2021-10-19 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/ZEWVbb1DjUaD-qf0kz0_o9hdFjs>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Call for agenda items - IETF 112
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Addition of privacy to the DNS protocol <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:19:58 -0000

On Oct 19, 2021, at 9:10 AM, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> wrote:
> 
> So far, we have seen one request for agenda time.

That request had two topics: 

>> We would like 30 minutes to discuss open issues in draft-ietf-dprive-unauth-to-authoritative, as well as starting interoperability testing so that the draft can be on standards track when it is first published as an RFC.
>> 
>> We also hope there is discussion of DSGLUE because that could be an optional part of the discovery part of draft-ietf-dprive-unauth-to-authoritative.

> Any other topics?

ORTT in DoQ seems ripe for discussion.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email