Re: [dns-privacy] [Australia] Data retention and DNS

Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> Tue, 01 September 2015 15:12 UTC

Return-Path: <rharolde@umich.edu>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF73C1B4F32 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 08:12:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.722
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.722 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cJhfZNC4MK6J for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 08:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-f174.google.com (mail-qk0-f174.google.com [209.85.220.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 623BD1B4D5A for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qkct7 with SMTP id t7so44271743qkc.1 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 Sep 2015 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=GLOgNs8u4YVnpE8jQEnZIMuj0NiySmsGo4ay/AwlY60=; b=NmWTgWXbD5lK5T7pIM5KZJyWkXqiEhkxSIkgyMZ7ALCgOjArd/r/POIQlz7/JiOHf8 hew0/DhA0N1TgKSYcCfS97GcD+FRxp3sAWQInx3P866lRu8jzZK8hm97iOTC9m4P5HXG zo1+Vi9lfB7kXVII8h/Ud8vukD64Lh+UlpCxLwN21UzlBpqKjFF0OYBzkF//AGvRerRA Nco0QXE193IRIW8GBbRJHPyP2/b7RZnduGfllq4YlXPoP+ASghTfeTKwI+fsN+pEn3p7 MjvBExDOA7+zyFF6leyeU9CJbbQjBcxQDu2aNotr1S6M8VmpmpyTbAf/oFO1in+LJrfi /4Tg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnmQ4xkkcrgiwTsZCpnDgO2Pky3OS8v5uHYkCYSmKDtDOXXc5bT4ZjD5tO/LipC9dOztUxm
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.13.238.66 with SMTP id x63mr19882770ywe.42.1441120318776; Tue, 01 Sep 2015 08:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.129.119.215 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 08:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150901075314.GA26350@nic.fr>
References: <20150901075314.GA26350@nic.fr>
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 11:11:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+nkc8Ab+4BhcMLVqSMmCbr9o=0KVVYemmSrUathj5AGEkv8Bw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c03608cb2543d051eb0f89c"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/_vJYDOTvt8q699FecY2yvaGQ1m0>
Cc: "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Australia] Data retention and DNS
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 15:12:13 -0000

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
wrote:

> Interesting:
>
> Australian government's "DATA RETENTION Frequently Asked Questions for
> Industry"
> <
> https://www.ag.gov.au/NationalSecurity/DataRetention/Documents/DataRetentionIndustryFAQS.pdf
> >
>
> Note a new section on the DNS:
>
> 8.3. Where I operate a Domain Name System (DNS) server, what data retention
> obligations do I have for this service? (NEW)
> *   The operation of the DNS is not a "relevant service", as it does not
> carry communications or
>     enable communications to be carried. While a DNS server is convenient
> to the carriage of
>     communications, it is not so central to the carriage of communications
> that it enables them.
> *   Therefore, the operation of a DNS server does not have data retention
> obligations.
> *   However, where the provider hosts the DNS server, it will have data
> retention obligations for the
>     hosting of the server.
> 8.4. Where I offer an internet access service, do I have to retain DNS
> requests from my
> customers? (NEW)
> *   Where a provider offers an internet access service, the internet
> access service provider does not
>     have to keep any DNS information.
> *   The DNS server is a "destination on the internet" and retaining that
> information would reveal
>     browsing history.
>
> That makes sense for a DNS resolver.  But for the Master Server for a
zone, the source data should be retained, either on that server, or if fed
by another server, at the source.