Re: [dns-privacy] Call for Adoption: draft-mayrhofer-dprive-padding-profile

Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com> Mon, 28 November 2016 11:26 UTC

Return-Path: <sara@sinodun.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11D9129521 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 03:26:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dym_zTtmumXy for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 03:26:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shcp01.hosting.zen.net.uk (shcp01.hosting.zen.net.uk [88.98.24.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79C03129D72 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 03:18:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [62.232.251.194] (port=20197 helo=virgo.sinodun.com) by shcp01.hosting.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <sara@sinodun.com>) id 1cBJx4-0006dl-Lm; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:18:37 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
From: Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com>
In-Reply-To: <20161118141331.6f2bbfba@pallas.home.time-travellers.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:18:26 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BA388E14-F269-48E9-82E4-205D6CA83E8F@sinodun.com>
References: <CAHw9_iJ9sz2dWyB=eLW6YjBP2p6bCvamWELpAwvgnONo_ZJ-5g@mail.gmail.com> <20161118141331.6f2bbfba@pallas.home.time-travellers.org>
To: Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - shcp01.hosting.zen.net.uk
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - sinodun.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: shcp01.hosting.zen.net.uk: authenticated_id: sara+sinodun.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
X-Authenticated-Sender: shcp01.hosting.zen.net.uk: sara@sinodun.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/gJVjp3Mpq4lns1VheyojLhhnm0w>
Cc: "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Call for Adoption: draft-mayrhofer-dprive-padding-profile
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:26:11 -0000

> On 18 Nov 2016, at 06:13, Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>; wrote:
> 
> Warren,
> 
> At 2016-11-18 13:42:08 +0900
> Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>; wrote:
> 
>> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-mayrhofer-dprive-padding-profile.
>> 
>> The draft is available here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mayrhofer-dprive-padding-profile/
>> 
>> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for
>> adoption by DPRIVE,
>> and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
> 
> I have read this draft and support its adoption by DPRIVE.

+1

> 
>> Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc.
> 
> I am willing to contribute text, and review, and even etc. if necessary.

+1 

> 
> --------
> 
> Note there was some discussion today in the working group about the
> approach that this document takes. The concern is that this seems to be
> a survey of possible techniques. Personally I think it makes sense to
> have two documents:
> 
> 1. A review of all possible approaches (the current document), and 
> 2. Recommendations for implementors (based on pending research and
>   analysis).
> 
> If we really only want one document, then probably it should start with
> recommendations and then include the review of techniques as an
> appendix.

I happen to favour this second approach of just one document, evolving the structure of the draft as the recommendations become clearer. 

Sara.