Re: [dns-privacy] Call for Adoption: draft-mayrhofer-dprive-padding-profile

[Bob Harold <[e-mail]>]

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Sara Dickinson <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
> > On 18 Nov 2016, at 06:13, Shane Kerr <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> > Warren,
> >
> > At 2016-11-18 13:42:08 +0900
> > Warren Kumari <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> >> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-mayrhofer-dprive-
> padding-profile.
> >>
> >> The draft is available here:
> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mayrhofer-dprive-
> padding-profile/
> >>
> >> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for
> >> adoption by DPRIVE,
> >> and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
> >
> > I have read this draft and support its adoption by DPRIVE.
>
> +1
>
> >
> >> Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc.
> >
> > I am willing to contribute text, and review, and even etc. if necessary.
>
> +1
>
> >
> > --------
> >
> > Note there was some discussion today in the working group about the
> > approach that this document takes. The concern is that this seems to be
> > a survey of possible techniques. Personally I think it makes sense to
> > have two documents:
> >
> > 1. A review of all possible approaches (the current document), and
> > 2. Recommendations for implementors (based on pending research and
> >   analysis).
> >
> > If we really only want one document, then probably it should start with
> > recommendations and then include the review of techniques as an
> > appendix.
>
> I happen to favour this second approach of just one document, evolving the
> structure of the draft as the recommendations become clearer.
>
> Sara.
>

I support and will review.  Prefer one doc.

-- 
Bob Harold