IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] Fwd: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-huitema-quic-dnsoquic-00.txt

Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> Tue, 11 April 2017 11:33 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC7C129444 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 04:33:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NhRuk1q6aI7p for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 04:33:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hydrogen.portfast.net (hydrogen.portfast.net [188.246.200.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8F2A126C25 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 04:33:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [46.227.151.81] (port=50806 helo=rays-mbp.local) by hydrogen.portfast.net ([188.246.200.2]:465) with esmtpsa (fixed_plain:ray@bellis.me.uk) (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) id 1cxu3D-0000Ef-8M (Exim 4.72) for dns-privacy@ietf.org (return-path <ray@bellis.me.uk>); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 12:33:35 +0100
To: dns-privacy@ietf.org
References: <0b31dc15-3e13-ac36-5c09-056ea8f1b2e8@huitema.net> <cbdb51e1-7f5a-9ddf-a30e-6ca9c2b9c67d@huitema.net> <40838cb2-347e-f852-4304-315473057f5a@sidn.nl>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Message-ID: <ddcbfe66-fc33-ad48-33e7-266e0b8ebbfc@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 12:33:36 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <40838cb2-347e-f852-4304-315473057f5a@sidn.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/gqRqFamGlWPw2rXzEiOOvCVyyrw>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Fwd: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-huitema-quic-dnsoquic-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:33:40 -0000


On 11/04/2017 12:28, Marco Davids (IETF IMAP) wrote:

> I see why port 953 was chosen. But it is also a longtime de facto
> default for the rndc communications channel of BIND.

Yes, it is.

I am trying to make that formal rather than de facto with IANA at the
moment.

Ray

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email