IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] [Last-Call] last call review of draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-03

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Wed, 08 January 2020 16:06 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DECCB1201B7; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 08:06:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xpiI68UQP2dP; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 08:06:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x142.google.com (mail-il1-x142.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 717B4120132; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 08:06:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x142.google.com with SMTP id t2so3066234ilq.9; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 08:06:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LT82G+i7ON6VjOjr0iFV0wQLy8VyXYN7zR3y5GTtkWw=; b=JIf58BWgY4IW4VW/msJuzuSTL3n6xAzvMQjMUZcVicVLG7BZg+vK4wzTuy1e0a+Y8j FBtrjiu0knSVOmQyLT/RxWYSTyxRAOK6xwB5WptMKKI3h4/CgTull6gIFjrbBpzXnLLo aITnj2/CiUsZSqQi8/skT/nL759t1RkfutfDIUxhhfJWfXgdx4gK1MyWeS2nKmtBEbD1 8JbE0mApKr9bxvv4rWm+lUoQrriKtJxHn9pTdFmmbjR6vv0hJZsOPEQ8HLLgZMW1k41O Wd3eg35O6ZPL3ZUXobzbsRs0F0V9+YjCIQUJku8JHMRzwt2neiNOpQJeZsxKM3Ot+eQg lWlQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LT82G+i7ON6VjOjr0iFV0wQLy8VyXYN7zR3y5GTtkWw=; b=aCN+arqFH8ilfavOrtdqyjm0OsDzYbKnKzM6g+j0GrP1xErFH0ia1QZZ9+vFQbJL3r kNwWgrjbh8+0YCByJfeLcI4SVX532ej3HkjtyZwC0W0QcAn80EXvxlDc98xxbLXkJ8Hg oMr/6O98O2B9LPJoUf/XkM7ixkCnMqCRAGxckNquanEtL9E557x+wETFwFCEb8ZMA4bj S7dE65LMPpOX9K0tCF3K3Ujyw31wJua7sbQ03Ic6XvKByAYU938fpKh3iRKFD00AtHmt KnT8FHcWY+KPW2pOVZUZReKwxhkTHKCs8fXYGW+XRJSKTV/b1JSN+kan13ox/P0vnddF 9Cpg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUK3ev7s6DwRjk8mGmsoiRjezsvQ57o7wD7j8XcNfQmxU4reAPw dpvNIDZsCFi1196xnftH4L0+7Z8vjmPutD8NjpA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxbLVfVSjYeK0NISlOnKDM5FUuXsUq05p/sPjFZpCY/UFdFASkZz27qKahAboZ6czKhV4GRkWvV7S1WQ4as6jg=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:5845:: with SMTP id m66mr4522581ilb.257.1578499573738; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 08:06:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <157504194893.4871.5551746255324168227@ietfa.amsl.com> <208AD30F-1213-4784-81FC-4AB76730CEC2@sinodun.com> <a02720cf-01b3-d61a-94d2-b3d0a399f107@cs.tcd.ie> <20191223220509.GK35479@kduck.mit.edu> <CAChr6SyAhA8V7AQHC67vTEmHWgd+gMzM-ZtFTkBDUhsvVQEC8A@mail.gmail.com> <614B534F-D62D-432C-A3E5-A01D9BF972AA@sinodun.com> <CAChr6SzbtzYPa8D6yFv+f74==6JFQtM+BVyPKR8NAiBG0p-icQ@mail.gmail.com> <98a36517-1a44-3804-6b4c-61be322c8bff@huitema.net> <CAChr6Szqf5xj6X6wGkgK5e=doc_4BkxXLykiP5Dqp-KcxceWhw@mail.gmail.com> <1894420162.19890.1578496284607@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com>
In-Reply-To: <1894420162.19890.1578496284607@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 08:06:02 -0800
Message-ID: <CAChr6SxpoT=1pYqr5i=WuoD7f4TUuXQVDvmw4FKP7BMyzPvP0Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
Cc: last-call@ietf.org, DNS Privacy Working Group <dns-privacy@ietf.org>, Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com>, draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005ef573059ba312ba"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/j5z1FXP1IUdnJo-ax8g5NHJ57i4>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Last-Call] last call review of draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-03
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 16:06:16 -0000

On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 7:11 AM Vittorio Bertola <
vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com> wrote:

>
> Il 08/01/2020 14:12 Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
>
> I think the concept you're describing is covered by RFC8484, as I wrote.
>
> Is there something in this document's DoH considerations that's new?
>
> But basically every DNS RFC from the past few years (e.g. the DoT ones)
> already has a privacy considerations section or discusses privacy issues.
> The point of RFC 7626, of which this draft is an update, was to provide the
> entire analysis in a single document. So why was RFC 7626 made then? Under
> your logic, it would not make sense to have it at all - but now we have it,
> and we are stuck with an obsolete version unless we update it.
>

RFC 7626 doesn't normatively reference any protocol documents other than
the original DNS RFCs, which do not have privacy or security considerations
sections.

It would be better to include more of this content by reference, or by
quoting the DoT and DoH RFCs directly.

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email