IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] FW: New Version Notification for draft-mglt-dprive-dns-uri-00.txt

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Thu, 19 March 2020 20:50 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5643A0F55 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 13:50:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FO3SnJ2z444v for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 13:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa5.dc.icann.org (ppa5.dc.icann.org [192.0.46.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 801B83A0F4A for <dprive@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 13:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PFE112-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (out.west.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.7]) by ppa5.dc.icann.org (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with ESMTPS id 02JKop7g028424 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 19 Mar 2020 20:50:52 GMT
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 13:50:49 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 13:50:49 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: "dprive@ietf.org" <dprive@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dns-privacy] [Ext] FW: New Version Notification for draft-mglt-dprive-dns-uri-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHV/i5NABb6v8pI80+k9Nrls1XWZqhQ2R+A
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 20:50:49 +0000
Message-ID: <105A1235-EF73-49CD-A3E4-DF41EA8DA24B@icann.org>
References: <158458660793.29426.18157657564263370854@ietfa.amsl.com> <SN6PR15MB2302088989EF9CC17A587E6AE3F40@SN6PR15MB2302.namprd15.prod.outlook.com> <CA+9kkMDtEMxzqO6nBoLKhjf4123uwo1a-dE29z4Tqq+q25Ax6A@mail.gmail.com> <CADZyTkmwY4w=tA0xZPCcBvx87ryMiujzD4B1eaAoVzZM-r0u4w@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMDWLNSpXADZbn4YXS6fR6FQ_rL90rfKwqDofHE7Q+3nSA@mail.gmail.com> <BE8D5804-10A5-4D9E-8EDD-0884E8717CB2@icann.org> <CADZyTkkUt7C5QUhPp15X=tT2wQQAsXAozh7hvW0=r7fkY_eoFA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADZyTkkUt7C5QUhPp15X=tT2wQQAsXAozh7hvW0=r7fkY_eoFA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: Processed
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_75C93ECC-2133-4F13-85AD-76A1826BC484"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.645 definitions=2020-03-19_08:2020-03-19, 2020-03-19 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/mEEHZAv8djr-T0Pwc3geZ9NLONQ>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] FW: New Version Notification for draft-mglt-dprive-dns-uri-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 20:51:00 -0000

On Mar 19, 2020, at 1:37 PM, Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Paul for the comment. I guess the reason for overkill is that too many schemes are created. The reason for underspecified is that the proposed doh scheme only reflects a subset of the parameters provided by a uri template.  On the other hand I understand that parameters of the URI template should not be provided as part of the URI scheme. Am I correct ? 
> 

Correct. People can't do parameters in URI schemes reliably at all.

As for your earlier question about http: and https:, many people now think in retrospect that that was a well-intentioned mistake. The fact that you have so many choices in your draft shows that it will only get worse.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email