IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Threat Model

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Tue, 05 November 2019 11:02 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687571208E1 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 03:02:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f5gfopkXzSYi for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 03:02:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCC5B1208D4 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 03:02:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:58032) by ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.136]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1iRwbR-0017xc-06 (Exim 4.92.3) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Tue, 05 Nov 2019 11:02:25 +0000
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 11:02:25 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
cc: dns-privacy@ietf.org, paul@nohats.ca
In-Reply-To: <20191104231906.81392E5C71B@ary.local>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1911051100290.8062@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <20191104231906.81392E5C71B@ary.local>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/ofa-7yd85KvdXB1RxUUirOpwMPc>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Threat Model
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 11:02:29 -0000

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> In article <alpine.LRH.2.21.1911041611360.5093@bofh.nohats.ca> you write:
> >> That's per-zone, though, whereas DoT support is per-server.
> >
> >Maybe that's ideal, but one would expect that a zone only rolls this
> >out once all their nameservers support it.
>
> Most of my zones have a secondary run by somebody else, whose software
> is never in sync with mine.

Yes, also it's operationally much less stressful if you can use a canary
deployment to verify a partial roll-out before full deployment.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Southeast Iceland: Cyclonic 4 to 6, increasing 7 in far northwest. Moderate or
rough. Wintry showers. Good, occasionally poor.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email