IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Recursive to Authoritative DNS with Unauthenticated Encryption (draft-ietf-dprive-unauth-to-authoritative-03) - feedback

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Fri, 10 September 2021 18:32 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B5B3A13B1; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 11:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GV2gqRaxLztA; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 11:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa5.dc.icann.org (ppa5.dc.icann.org [192.0.46.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 597CC3A13B0; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 11:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MBX112-E2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.7]) by ppa5.dc.icann.org (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with ESMTPS id 18AIWGqS019699 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Sep 2021 18:32:17 GMT
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.922.13; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 11:32:16 -0700
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) with mapi id 15.02.0922.013; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 11:32:15 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: "AlBanna, Zaid" <zalbanna=40verisign.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: "dprive@ietf.org" <dprive@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] [dns-privacy] Recursive to Authoritative DNS with Unauthenticated Encryption (draft-ietf-dprive-unauth-to-authoritative-03) - feedback
Thread-Index: AQHXmCvC7ZSv4nRpuUmUcmAeTcyMVqueKVyA
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 18:32:15 +0000
Message-ID: <799C084A-F895-431B-85F1-453C8430A8AC@icann.org>
References: <DB9744F6-4E2F-4E15-881D-5DA0C27489E1@verisign.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB9744F6-4E2F-4E15-881D-5DA0C27489E1@verisign.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: Processed
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_171E458B-C706-4D2F-891C-22C9E0CCE603"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-09-10_07:2021-09-09, 2021-09-10 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/okLHALNvtY2lSLW1S8lsP9eEQKQ>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Recursive to Authoritative DNS with Unauthenticated Encryption (draft-ietf-dprive-unauth-to-authoritative-03) - feedback
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Addition of privacy to the DNS protocol <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 18:32:22 -0000

Sorry for the long delay in getting back to you on this. We're still trying to figure out what is happening in the WG, given that there is now no draft describing any fully-authenticated use case and/or protocol proposal.

Thanks for the proposals! They all seem good, and we'll incorporate them in the next draft.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email