[dns-privacy] Re: Verisign's RFC 9539 Experiment

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

Hi Scott,

On 12/06/2025 20:36, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> Earlier today I added text describing Verisign's RFC 9539 Experiment to GitHub:
> 
> https://github.com/ietf-wg-dprive/9539-data/blob/main/Verisign's%20RFC%209539%20Experiment

Thanks for posting that summary.

I do wonder though how much weight ought be attached to experiments
unless those can be replicated, so have you considered posting more
detail so that others (other TLD operators for example) could try to
do commensurate experiments? Without the ability to replicate an
experiment, it's hard to evaluate anything.

Thanks,
S.

PS: Having said that, encrypted DNS to a large TLD operator poses
obviously hard problems, so I'm not expecting confirmatory studies
could show hugely different results, but if we want to experiment
in a scientific manner, the ability to replicate is crucial.

PPS: Apologies if I missed where there's more information about the
experiment somewhere else, which is entirely possible;-)



> Scott
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dns-privacy mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]