Re: [dns-privacy] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls-05.txt

🔓Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com> Thu, 17 March 2016 23:56 UTC

Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FBC212DD62 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8GDEJ2TbmsOy for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3554F12DDDB for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:56:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=985; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1458258993; x=1459468593; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=sKWG2KDyPEPc9ZeoN8H1G7HjynD6t1QrpGxfFzUovU0=; b=axKA+p+5+tJ9mbh70My3A+zAPuUnIvrAIsJWTRIaN2Pym3gsgIy92aTT fnu1kSC/NrQFHded7qvxXyjQecaH95ShlMzuAE4SL9bTs+w5JwOq3Ibyr lGXh8nXz/66oKJ6ZFcZBjQ02X15zP/0HP6wlaSMuMw2uubBLGIGTyyFsq k=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,351,1454976000"; d="scan'208";a="250554713"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Mar 2016 23:56:32 +0000
Received: from [10.24.109.130] ([10.24.109.130]) (authenticated bits=0) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u2HNtXDg008874 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 17 Mar 2016 23:56:32 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
From: 🔓Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160316133559.GA16437@nic.fr>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:56:31 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CB1C2053-D68A-4B7B-9443-CABC26C920BB@cisco.com>
References: <20160316045110.15311.36194.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <941c4764331d4933b63b720cba53bc6e@XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com> <20160316133559.GA16437@nic.fr>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
X-Authenticated-User: dwing
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/u25vmKzCTtOjGXLYwj19mzCP1RA>
Cc: "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>, Tirumaleswar Reddy <tireddy@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls-05.txt
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 23:56:41 -0000

On 16-Mar-2016 06:36 am, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 04:54:33AM +0000,
> Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) <tireddy@cisco.com> wrote 
> a message of 64 lines which said:
> 
>> This revision addresses comments from Stephane.
> 
> Yes, I like the new text in the Security Considerations. But I'm not
> completely happy with the changes.
> 
> 1) There is now no mention of ICMP. I understand why, ICMP is not
> authentified but I can hear the IESG asking "What the client should do
> when receiving ICMP errors?"

Treat all ICMP errors as soft errors (RFC1122 defines hard and soft ICMP errors).

-d

> 2) You now demultiplex by "Query ID, Query type and Query class". What
> about the QNAME? It seems more important than the class...
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dns-privacy mailing list
> dns-privacy@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy