[dnsdir] Dnsdir last call review of draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-10

Nicolai Leymann via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 24 January 2023 08:59 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnsdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02BE4C14F727; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 00:59:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Nicolai Leymann via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: dnsdir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 9.6.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <167455078899.33643.17333784762827980480@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Nicolai Leymann <n.leymann@telekom.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 00:59:48 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/QZzbQ-KDHfJSUkfIa2SEZYUI2so>
Subject: [dnsdir] Dnsdir last call review of draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-10
X-BeenThere: dnsdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: DNS Directorate <dnsdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsdir>, <mailto:dnsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsdir>, <mailto:dnsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 08:59:49 -0000

Reviewer: Nicolai Leymann
Review result: Ready

Reviewer: Nicolai Leymann
Review Result: Ready 
Draft: draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations

Hi, 

I'm the designated DNS Directorate (dnsdir) reviewer for this document.

The draft updates RFC3552 requiring future RFCs to contain a vulnerability 
assessment of their transient numeric identifiers. The document lists 
common flaws in the generation of  transient numeric identifiers. Based on 
that it defines  requirements for future protocols specifications using 
transient numeric identifiers.

The draft itself is not specific to DNS but uses DNS Transaction IDs as one 
of the examples for underspecified transient numeric identifiers.

Overall, I think this draft is well written, easy to understand and ready for
Publication.