[dnsext] Protocol Action: 'Domain Name System (DNS) IANA Considerations' to Best Current Practice (draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc6195bis-05.txt)
The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Thu, 06 December 2012 21:11 UTC
Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD2AD21F8983; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 13:11:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.49
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.49 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.109, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e6KE-xvG2T5I; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 13:11:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D38821F898B; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 13:11:00 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.36
Message-ID: <20121206211100.14488.62562.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 13:11:00 -0800
Cc: dnsext chair <dnsext-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, dnsext mailing list <dnsext@ietf.org>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: [dnsext] Protocol Action: 'Domain Name System (DNS) IANA Considerations' to Best Current Practice (draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc6195bis-05.txt)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 21:11:01 -0000
The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Domain Name System (DNS) IANA Considerations' (draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc6195bis-05.txt) as Best Current Practice This document is the product of the DNS Extensions Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Ralph Droms and Brian Haberman. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc6195bis/ Technical Summary This document specifies Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) parameter assignment considerations for the allocation of Domain Name System (DNS) resource record types, CLASSes, operation codes, error codes, DNS protocol message header bits, and AFSDB resource record subtypes. Working Group Summary This document is to a large extent the same as its predecessor, but the working group has made some simplifications in process and these were not controversial. There is strong consensus behind this document. Document Quality There are many DNS implementations. This document is high quality due to reviews by a number of strong reviewers/experts including Alfred Hoenes and Mark Andrews. Personnel The document Shepherd is Olafur Gudmundsson ogud@ogud.com Ralph Droms is the Responsible Area Director.
- [dnsext] Protocol Action: 'Domain Name System (DN… The IESG
- [dnsext] RFC 5155 errata to be Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 5155 errata to be Brian Dickson
- [dnsext] Restating the question in Re: RFC 5155 e… Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] Restating the question in Re: RFC 51… Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] Restating the question in Re: RFC 51… Ben Laurie
- Re: [dnsext] Restating the question in Re: RFC 51… Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 5155 errata to be Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 5155 errata to be Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 5155 errata to be Matthijs Mekking
- [dnsext] A question on opt-out implementations Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] A question on opt-out implementations Mark Andrews
- [dnsext] Update to RFC 5155. Maybe? Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] Update to RFC 5155. Maybe? Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [dnsext] Update to RFC 5155. Maybe? Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Update to RFC 5155. Maybe? Blacka, David
- Re: [dnsext] Update to RFC 5155. Maybe? Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] Update to RFC 5155. Maybe? Matthijs Mekking
- [dnsext] Clarifying a few points in Re: Update to… Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] Clarifying a few points in Re: Updat… Miek Gieben
- Re: [dnsext] Clarifying a few points in Re: Updat… Blacka, David
- Re: [dnsext] Clarifying a few points in Re: Updat… Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] Clarifying a few points in Re: Updat… Blacka, David
- Re: [dnsext] Clarifying a few points in Re: Updat… Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] Clarifying a few points in Re: Updat… Jiankang YAO
- Re: [dnsext] Clarifying a few points in Re: Updat… Miek Gieben
- Re: [dnsext] Clarifying a few points in Re: Updat… Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [dnsext] Clarifying a few points in Re: Updat… Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] Clarifying a few points in Re: Updat… Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [dnsext] Clarifying a few points in Re: Updat… Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] Clarifying a few points in Re: Updat… Matthijs Mekking
- Re: [dnsext] Clarifying a few points in Re: Updat… Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] Clarifying a few points in Re: Updat… Mohan Parthasarathy
- [dnsext] On dying WGs, bugs and incompatibilities… Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] Clarifying a few points in Re: Updat… Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] Clarifying a few points in Re: Updat… Matthijs Mekking
- [dnsext] Wrap up of RFC 5155 issue Edward Lewis