IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txt

Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> Tue, 14 February 2012 08:35 UTC

Return-Path: <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBFF21F8680 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:35:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.972
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.972 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.277, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ADJNmpO5M57U for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:35:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ka.mail.enyo.de (ka.mail.enyo.de [87.106.162.201]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85FCD21F867F for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:35:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.17.135.4] (helo=deneb.enyo.de) by ka.mail.enyo.de with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) id 1RxDr9-0003E9-J1; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:35:23 +0100
Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <fw@deneb.enyo.de>) id 1RxDr9-0002QC-AQ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:35:23 +0100
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: Joao Damas <joao@bondis.org>
References: <20120207130116.22821.43383.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4F344AD0.9040607@ogud.com> <871upyept1.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <82D39247-19E7-4CC9-A847-574D69B808E6@bondis.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:35:23 +0100
In-Reply-To: <82D39247-19E7-4CC9-A847-574D69B808E6@bondis.org> (Joao Damas's message of "Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:33:21 -0800")
Message-ID: <87pqdh4xtg.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org, Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:35:28 -0000

* Joao Damas:

> i don't think we could introduce that feature and still call this EDNS(0)

Which feature?

With the draft, when queried with an OPT RR, you either have to answer
with an OPT RR, or produce a FORMERR.  This answer wouldn't be allowed
anymore:

; <<>> DiG 9.7.3 <<>> @ns3.schlund.de. quantenblog.net. +dnssec +norecurse
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 41252
;; flags: qr aa; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;quantenblog.net.               IN      A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
quantenblog.net.        86400   IN      A       212.227.229.215

;; Query time: 34 msec
;; SERVER: 217.160.80.131#53(217.160.80.131)
;; WHEN: Tue Feb 14 09:33:21 2012
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 49

This definitely looks like an error in the draft to me.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email