Re: [dnsext] a plea for restraint
"Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com> Tue, 14 September 2010 20:55 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 445DD3A6B17; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:55:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.043
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.043 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.067, BAYES_05=-1.11]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hGGiFLituXl4; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19C23A6AB5; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1OvcTh-000FJP-1J for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:51:45 +0000
Received: from elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.67]) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>) id 1OvcTd-000FIr-5t for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:51:42 +0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=ix.netcom.com; b=TjBGaIkt1GQzw7fAhbnlfNJ31cWV7x2Kk6HfRsQdlotsy7lMflGae8viPadVgpRm; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Cc:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [209.86.224.33] (helo=elwamui-darkeyed.atl.sa.earthlink.net) by elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>) id 1OvcTb-0003xD-7F; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:51:39 -0400
Received: from 99.93.224.206 by webmail.earthlink.net with HTTP; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:51:39 -0400
Message-ID: <8071314.1284497499185.JavaMail.root@elwamui-darkeyed.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:51:39 -0500
From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
To: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com, Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] a plea for restraint
Cc: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: EarthLink Zoo Mail 1.0
X-ELNK-Trace: c8e3929e1e9c87a874cfc7ce3b1ad11381c87f5e51960688b1ed42f3827373d637688bdea9dad934350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 209.86.224.33
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
Bill and all, good point! One that is often not thought of or at least publically mentioned for a number of reasons, some obvious and some not. -----Original Message----- >From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com >Sent: Sep 13, 2010 5:44 PM >To: Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org> >Cc: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org >Subject: Re: [dnsext] a plea for restraint > > >in other circles, if your names -DOESNT_ show up, then you are clearly not >engaged and when you finally do have an opinion, its not worth sharing, since >the invested folks have already come to an agreement... "The WG has already >decided..." > >--bill (who sort of agrees with Pauls snetiment, if not his means of expressing it) > > >On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:25:29PM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote: >> if you see your name below more than twice, please go to a web browser and >> read <http://www.thementalmilitia.com/wiki/Yammerhead> and consider more >> carefully the effect you're having on us bystanders. i CANNOT keep up and >> so i'm just refiling it all. one carefully considered essay-style message >> per person per day would be difficult enough, but i would at least try. >> when it's back and forth back and forth i just don't care and won't try. >> i am probably not alone. when we later try to declare consensus then a lot >> of folks will suddenly start reading again and we'll discover that we only >> had a consensus among the top talkers. PLEASE put a lid on it, gentlemen! >> >> 10299 09/13 "W.C.A. Wijngaard Re: [dnsext] DNAME with exceptions - work-arou >> 10300 09/13 Niall O'Reilly Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no prot >> 10301 09/13 Florian Weimer Re: [dnsext] RFC 2142 and "organization's top >> 10302 09/13 fujiwara@jprs.co. Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: No protocol cha >> 10303 09/13 fujiwara@jprs.co. Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: No protocol cha >> 10304 09/13 Alex Bligh Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no prot >> 10305 09/13 Niall O'Reilly Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no prot >> 10306 09/13 Alex Bligh Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no prot >> 10307 09/13 Niall O'Reilly Re: [dnsext] DNAME with exceptions - work-arou >> 10308 09/13 Brian Dickson [dnsext] Name equivalence - thoughts on the Gr >> 10309 09/13 Niall O'Reilly Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no prot >> 10310 09/13 Brian Dickson Re: [dnsext] DNAME with exceptions - work-arou >> 10311 09/13 Alex Bligh Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no prot >> 10312 09/13 Alex Bligh Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence - thoughts on th >> 10313 09/13 Paul Hoffman Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence - thoughts on th >> 10314 09/13 Tony Finch Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence - thoughts on th >> 10315 09/13 Niall O'Reilly Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no prot >> 10316 09/13 Alex Bligh Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no prot >> 10317 09/13 Niall O'Reilly Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no prot > Regards, Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 300k members/stakeholders and growing, strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com Phone: 214-244-4827
- Re: [dnsext] a plea for restraint bmanning
- [dnsext] a plea for restraint Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] a plea for restraint Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] a plea for restraint Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dnsext] a plea for restraint Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] a plea for restraint Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] a plea for restraint Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dnsext] a plea for restraint Jeffrey A. Williams