Re: [dnsext] a plea for restraint
bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com Mon, 13 September 2010 22:51 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE883A681A; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:51:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.364
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.364 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.235, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PvR4cnbSHt9P; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56A543A67FF; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1OvHo4-0009pB-BF for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:47:24 +0000
Received: from [2001:478:6:0:230:48ff:fe11:220a] (helo=vacation.karoshi.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <bmanning@karoshi.com>) id 1OvHo0-0009iF-SD for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:47:21 +0000
Received: from karoshi.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by vacation.karoshi.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id o8DMiQDY018902; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:44:26 GMT
Received: (from bmanning@localhost) by karoshi.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id o8DMiQd5018901; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:44:26 GMT
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:44:26 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>
Cc: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] a plea for restraint
Message-ID: <20100913224426.GA18800@vacation.karoshi.com.>
References: <14080.1284416729@nsa.vix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <14080.1284416729@nsa.vix.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
in other circles, if your names -DOESNT_ show up, then you are clearly not engaged and when you finally do have an opinion, its not worth sharing, since the invested folks have already come to an agreement... "The WG has already decided..." --bill (who sort of agrees with Pauls snetiment, if not his means of expressing it) On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:25:29PM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote: > if you see your name below more than twice, please go to a web browser and > read <http://www.thementalmilitia.com/wiki/Yammerhead> and consider more > carefully the effect you're having on us bystanders. i CANNOT keep up and > so i'm just refiling it all. one carefully considered essay-style message > per person per day would be difficult enough, but i would at least try. > when it's back and forth back and forth i just don't care and won't try. > i am probably not alone. when we later try to declare consensus then a lot > of folks will suddenly start reading again and we'll discover that we only > had a consensus among the top talkers. PLEASE put a lid on it, gentlemen! > > 10299 09/13 "W.C.A. Wijngaard Re: [dnsext] DNAME with exceptions - work-arou > 10300 09/13 Niall O'Reilly Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no prot > 10301 09/13 Florian Weimer Re: [dnsext] RFC 2142 and "organization's top > 10302 09/13 fujiwara@jprs.co. Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: No protocol cha > 10303 09/13 fujiwara@jprs.co. Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: No protocol cha > 10304 09/13 Alex Bligh Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no prot > 10305 09/13 Niall O'Reilly Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no prot > 10306 09/13 Alex Bligh Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no prot > 10307 09/13 Niall O'Reilly Re: [dnsext] DNAME with exceptions - work-arou > 10308 09/13 Brian Dickson [dnsext] Name equivalence - thoughts on the Gr > 10309 09/13 Niall O'Reilly Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no prot > 10310 09/13 Brian Dickson Re: [dnsext] DNAME with exceptions - work-arou > 10311 09/13 Alex Bligh Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no prot > 10312 09/13 Alex Bligh Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence - thoughts on th > 10313 09/13 Paul Hoffman Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence - thoughts on th > 10314 09/13 Tony Finch Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence - thoughts on th > 10315 09/13 Niall O'Reilly Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no prot > 10316 09/13 Alex Bligh Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no prot > 10317 09/13 Niall O'Reilly Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no prot
- Re: [dnsext] a plea for restraint bmanning
- [dnsext] a plea for restraint Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] a plea for restraint Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] a plea for restraint Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dnsext] a plea for restraint Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] a plea for restraint Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] a plea for restraint Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dnsext] a plea for restraint Jeffrey A. Williams