Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-experiments-02

Geoffrey Sisson <geoff@nominet.org.uk> Wed, 15 March 2006 18:10 UTC

Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:03:07 +0000
From: Geoffrey Sisson <geoff@nominet.org.uk>
Message-Id: <200603151803.k2FI37YO018297@staff.nominet.org.uk>
To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-experiments-02
In-Reply-To: <EE91D423-F25F-4C40-8025-C08DDE61BB74@NLnetLabs.nl>
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk

I have reviewed draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-experiments-02 and believe it
is ready to be forwarded to the IESG for consideration for publication
as a standards-track RFC.

Nits:

- Should RFC 2119 be a normative reference rather than informative?

- "DNSSEC-aware" is presumably the same thing as "security-aware" in
  RFC 4033, but it may be a good idea to state this explicitly.

- In Section 4, second-to-last paragraph, "experiments" should 
  be "experiment's" (with apostrophe).

- In Section 5, paragraph 2, "may" should probably be "MAY".


Suggestions:

- In Section 6.1, change "the not validatable response" to
  "a non-validatable response"?

- In Section 6.2, change "not aware" to "unaware"?


Geoff

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-experiments-02 Geoffrey Sisson