IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-05.txt

Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl> Mon, 26 March 2012 11:06 UTC

Return-Path: <miekg@atoom.net>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A41121F859A for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 04:06:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.284
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.284 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.316, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m-WZZSZ5zAwc for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 04:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elektron.atoom.net (cl-201.ede-01.nl.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:7b8:2ff:c8::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C124C21F8613 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 04:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by elektron.atoom.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 31A7D3FEF4; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:06:10 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:06:10 +0200
From: Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20120326110610.GA29525@miek.nl>
Mail-Followup-To: dnsext@ietf.org
References: <18D7F4C6-544F-40CE-91EF-45C77E80AE5F@frobbit.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <18D7F4C6-544F-40CE-91EF-45C77E80AE5F@frobbit.se>
User-Agent: Vim/Mutt/Linux
X-Home: http://www.miek.nl
Subject: Re: [dnsext] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-05.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:06:14 -0000

[ Quoting <paf@frobbit.se> in "[dnsext] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnsext-..." ]
> All,
> 
> First of all, please note the version number I want you to (re-)read. It is
> posted basically "now", but for the ones that want to check before it ends up
> in the repository, I have also attached a copy.

Looks good to me.

One nit though:

> 3.2.  Validating Stub Resolvers
> 
>    A validating stub resolver already (usually) sets the DO bit
>    [RFC4035] to indicate that it wishes to receive additional DNSSEC RRs
>    (i.e.  RRSIG RR's) in the response.  Such validating resolvers SHOULD
>    include the DAU, DHU and/or the N3U option(s) in the OPT RR when
>    sending a query.  This way thee validating stub resolver indicates
                                ^^^^
the

grtz Miek

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email