[dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6840 (4928)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 08 February 2017 11:31 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6031294F8 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 03:31:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id su-ohr_9hSBM for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 03:31:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B64B129406 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 03:31:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 00E85B81D27; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 03:31:40 -0800 (PST)
To: weiler@tislabs.com, davidb@verisign.com, suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com, terry.manderson@icann.org, ogud@ogud.com, ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20170208113141.00E85B81D27@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 03:31:40 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsext/6C5zkJuuRU4BEaafq4b7WROiTOE>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:14:04 -0800
Cc: text/plain@rfc-editor.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.orgContent-Type, dnsext@ietf.org, charset=UTF-8@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6840 (4928)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsext/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 11:31:42 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6840, "Clarifications and Implementation Notes for DNS Security (DNSSEC)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6840&eid=4928 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Petr Spacek <petr.spacek@nic.cz> Section: IANA Conside Original Text ------------- (This document specifies no IANA Actions.) Corrected Text -------------- (Add following text:) This document adds an additional reference for DO bit in the DNS Parameters - DNS Header Flags registry. Notes ----- RFC6840 introduces new behaviour for DO bit in replies. This should be reflected in the DNS Header Flags registry otherwise it is likely DNS Implementors will overlook the new behaviour. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6840 (draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-20) -------------------------------------- Title : Clarifications and Implementation Notes for DNS Security (DNSSEC) Publication Date : February 2013 Author(s) : S. Weiler, Ed., D. Blacka, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : DNS Extensions Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6840 (492… RFC Errata System