[dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6840 (4928)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 08 February 2017 11:31 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6031294F8 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 03:31:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.203
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id su-ohr_9hSBM for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 03:31:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B64B129406 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 03:31:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 00E85B81D27; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 03:31:40 -0800 (PST)
To: weiler@tislabs.com, davidb@verisign.com, suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com, terry.manderson@icann.org, ogud@ogud.com, ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20170208113141.00E85B81D27@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 03:31:40 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsext/6C5zkJuuRU4BEaafq4b7WROiTOE>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:14:04 -0800
Cc: text/plain@rfc-editor.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.orgContent-Type, dnsext@ietf.org, charset=UTF-8@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6840 (4928)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsext/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 11:31:42 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6840,
"Clarifications and Implementation Notes for DNS Security (DNSSEC)".

You may review the report below and at:

Type: Technical
Reported by: Petr Spacek <petr.spacek@nic.cz>

Section: IANA Conside

Original Text
(This document specifies no IANA Actions.)

Corrected Text
(Add following text:)
This document adds an additional reference for DO bit in the DNS
Parameters - DNS Header Flags registry.

RFC6840 introduces new behaviour for DO bit in replies. This should be reflected in the DNS Header Flags registry otherwise it is likely DNS Implementors will overlook the new behaviour.

This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

RFC6840 (draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-20)
Title               : Clarifications and Implementation Notes for DNS Security (DNSSEC)
Publication Date    : February 2013
Author(s)           : S. Weiler, Ed., D. Blacka, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : DNS Extensions
Area                : Internet
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG