[dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5155 (3544)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 10 March 2013 18:16 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0B021F86BB for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.561
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.561 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HzKKg7h-MJDF for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6382B21F86A8 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id BF4B3B1E003; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
To: ben@links.org, geoff-s@panix.com, roy@nominet.org.uk, davidb@verisign.com, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, brian@innovationslab.net, ogud@ogud.com, ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20130310181607.BF4B3B1E003@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:16:07 -0700
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:54:26 -0700
Cc: andy@arin.net, dnsext@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5155 (3544)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 18:16:16 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5155, "DNS Security (DNSSEC) Hashed Authenticated Denial of Existence". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5155&eid=3544 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Andy Newton <andy@arin.net> Section: 3.3 Original Text ------------- The Next Hashed Owner Name field is represented as an unpadded sequence of case-insensitive base32 digits, without whitespace. Corrected Text -------------- The Next Hashed Owner Name field is represented as an unpadded sequence of case-insensitive base32hex digits, without whitespace Notes ----- RFC 4648 Section 7 says: 'This encoding may be referred to as "base32hex". This encoding should not be regarded as the same as the "base32" encoding and should not be referred to as only "base32".' There are many spots in RFC 5155 that use the term base32 where base32hex is the appropriate term. Section 3.3 above is the most important, but Section 1.1 uses the term as well Section 3 paragraph 4 and Section 3.2 paragraph 8. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5155 (draft-ietf-dnsext-nsec3-13) -------------------------------------- Title : DNS Security (DNSSEC) Hashed Authenticated Denial of Existence Publication Date : March 2008 Author(s) : B. Laurie, G. Sisson, R. Arends, D. Blacka Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : DNS Extensions Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5155 (354… RFC Errata System