IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2782 (2984)

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Wed, 05 October 2011 01:26 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B603C21F8D4A for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 18:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.039
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.039 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.051, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cJmRytavoLNz for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 18:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3392721F8D46 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 18:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 45871 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2011 01:44:29 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 5 Oct 2011 01:44:29 -0000
Message-ID: <4E8BB2D9.10000@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 10:28:57 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsext@ietf.org
References: <20111004203900.4016798C25F@rfc-editor.org> <4E8B9014.3060000@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <4E8B9515.3060503@oracle.com> <4E8BA347.7060208@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <4E8BB111.5010004@mail-abuse.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E8BB111.5010004@mail-abuse.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2782 (2984)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 01:26:20 -0000

Douglas Otis wrote:

> Even use of "." as a null target is problematic when this
> convention is ignored.

Agreed.

> What problem does a "." (null) service reference improve
> over simply not having an entry?

Not having an entry might mean Name is the Target.

At least, I specified so in draft-ohta-urlsrv-00.txt.

						Masataka Ohta

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status