Re: Fw: Approval to Post Version -00 Internet-Drafts for the 61st IETF Meeting in Washington, DC, USA

Ólafur Gudmundsson/DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com> Mon, 27 September 2004 15:27 UTC

Received: from psg.com (mailnull@psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA07504 for <dnsext-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:27:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD)) id 1CBxMU-000Ij3-Ou for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:24:22 +0000
Received: from [66.92.146.160] (helo=ogud.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD)) id 1CBxMK-000Ihn-11 for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:24:12 +0000
Received: from Puki.ogud.com (ns.ogud.com [66.92.146.160]) by ogud.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8RFNq3q046304 for <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:23:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ogud@ogud.com)
Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20040927111425.02b87ec0@localhost>
X-Sender: (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:24:07 -0400
To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
From: Ólafur Gudmundsson/DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com>
Subject: Re: Fw: Approval to Post Version -00 Internet-Drafts for the 61st IETF Meeting in Washington, DC, USA
In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.2.20040927110541.02957ec0@localhost>
References: <20040927135346.7a0641fd.olaf@ripe.net> <6.1.2.0.2.20040927110541.02957ec0@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on psg.com
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk

At 11:07 27/09/2004, Mike StJohns wrote:
>Is there agreement to accept 
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-stjohns-dnssec-trustupdate-01.txt 
>  "Automated Updates of DNSSEC Trust Anchors" as a WG draft?  If so, I'll 
>repost it as draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-trustupdate-00.txt.

Does anyone in the working group object that we admit the this document and
the Threshold key validation schema described in
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ihren-dnsext-threshold-validation-01.txt? 


It was the sense of the room in San Diego to admit these documents
as working group items, but we chairs forgot to officially ask this
question on the mailing list.

The reason to do this work in DNSEXT is that one or both these
proposals want to use bits in the DNSKEY record for signaling of
state change(s).

         Olafur DNSEXT co-chair


--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>