Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT future

Edward Lewis <ed.lewis@neustar.biz> Wed, 24 July 2013 19:09 UTC

Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FC518C99-2F2F-4DEE-90D6-31238FAA7AD8"
From: Edward Lewis <ed.lewis@neustar.biz>
In-Reply-To: <200703270035.l2R0ZNKK072363@ogud.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:09:50 -0400
Message-Id: <69DCC85E-411F-444E-A6DF-94B1401A3BF9@neustar.biz>
References: <200703270035.l2R0ZNKK072363@ogud.com>
To: dnsextmailing list <dnsext@ietf.org>
Cc: Edward Lewis <ed.lewis@neustar.biz>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT future
Precedence: list

At IETF 68 it was suggested that the group close.

On Mar 26, 2007, at 20:36, îlafur GuÝmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair wrote:

> From: îlafur GuÝmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com>
> Subject: DNSEXT future 
> Date: March 26, 2007 20:36:10 EDT
> To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
> List-Id: DNSEXT discussion <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
> 
> Dear Colleagues:
> 
> Last week in the WG meeting at IETF68 the chairs raised the issue that
> the working group has basically concluded all of its working group items.
> The chairs believe that there are no DNS protocol CHANGES that are being
> developed.
> With the conclusion of the NSEC3 work there seems to be consensus
> that DNSSEC work is done.

...

> 	Olafur & Olaf 

6 years later, on a new mail list, and even with a change in a co-chair, it happens.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis             
NeuStar                    You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468

There are no answers - just tradeoffs, decisions, and responses.

Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT future Edward Lewis