IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] Last Call: <draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-01.txt> (Special-Use Domain Names) to Proposed Standard

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Fri, 04 February 2011 12:50 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479653A6959 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 04:50:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -108.73
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-108.73 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.519, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id juCqClYuVIzF for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 04:50:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (mx2.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3003:2::4:11]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8ED3A6B9B for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 04:50:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F0701C0028; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 13:53:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay1.nic.fr (relay1.nic.fr [192.134.4.162]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7D41C0017; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 13:53:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by relay1.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE99568122; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 13:53:24 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 13:53:24 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
Message-ID: <20110204125324.GA11826@nic.fr>
References: <20110117230048.26192.84056.idtracker@localhost> <2A149A97-3B0A-49AA-88CA-9741F88B9274@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1102011628070.14850@fledge.watson.org> <82hbckhsyx.fsf@mid.bfk.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <82hbckhsyx.fsf@mid.bfk.de>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 6.0
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Last Call: <draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-01.txt> (Special-Use Domain Names) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:50:01 -0000

On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 12:41:58PM +0000,
 Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de> wrote 
 a message of 26 lines which said:

> > I observe that the document is not putting any names in the registry
> > it is creating.  Are there names that should be in the registry?
> 
> LOCAL. 

It is not mentioned in draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-01
(otherwise, I would have challenged the right of Apple to hijack TLD
by unilateral decision).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email