Re: DNSSECbis Q-17: typecode change and TKEY

Rob Austein <sra+namedroppers@hactrn.net> Thu, 09 October 2003 18:01 UTC

Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 13:45:28 -0400
From: Rob Austein <sra+namedroppers@hactrn.net>
To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: DNSSECbis Q-17: typecode change and TKEY
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSX.4.56.0310091638590.3353@forastero.dynamic.schlyter.se>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0310090922070.2350@elektron.atoom.net> <Pine.OSX.4.56.0310091638590.3353@forastero.dynamic.schlyter.se>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.0 (Venus) Emacs/20.7 Mule/4.0 (HANANOEN)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-Id: <20031009174528.51CA418F8@thrintun.hactrn.net>
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk

At Thu, 9 Oct 2003 16:40:26 +0200 (CEST), Jakob Schlyter wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Roy Arends wrote:
> 
> > 1) retain KEY, SIG RR for the use of TKEY as well as SIG(0).
> > 2) Have draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-2535typecode-change update RFC 2930 as
> >    well.
> 
> I'd would go for (1) since signing transactions and rr sets have different
> usages, separating the keys makes sense.

What Jakob said.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

Re: DNSSECbis Q-17: typecode change and TKEY Rob Austein