IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] Adoption of draft-dempsky-dnscurve-01

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Fri, 09 July 2010 21:37 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AFC33A68BD; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:37:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xucq75C1xLUr; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081B03A681D; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1OXLC5-0000SV-3R for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:33:13 +0000
Received: from [2001:4900:1:392:213:20ff:fe1b:3bfe] (helo=monster.hopcount.ca) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <jabley@hopcount.ca>) id 1OXLC2-0000SD-Dt for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:33:10 +0000
Received: from [199.212.90.29] (helo=dh29.r1.owls.hopcount.ca) by monster.hopcount.ca with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <jabley@hopcount.ca>) id 1OXLBu-000Jen-KE; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:33:09 +0000
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Adoption of draft-dempsky-dnscurve-01
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <20100707165338.GD5157@vacation.karoshi.com.>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:33:01 -0400
Cc: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F63B012E-93A5-488A-82CA-B34F8870D1C0@hopcount.ca>
References: <20100705182225.GH49823@shinkuro.com> <4C3307D8.1020802@sidn.nl> <20100706153707.GE53776@shinkuro.com> <84D63CCF-9BE6-43AA-B8F4-3403005E8177@icsi.berkeley.edu> <AANLkTinqs-TnlitX9WR8xw7mGwC6rMFw6MD27yp8cFfu@mail.gmail.com> <20100707054706.GB57099@shinkuro.com> <FF0A4FEA75585F852CBB0FEF@dhcp-111.xcalibre.co.uk> <2052.1278511276@nsa.vix.com> <20100707165338.GD5157@vacation.karoshi.com.>
To: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 199.212.90.29
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jabley@hopcount.ca
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on monster.hopcount.ca); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

On 2010-07-07, at 12:53, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:

>>> --On 7 July 2010 01:47:06 -0400 Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com> wrote:
> 
> 	The WG has two choices:
> 
> 	) adopt the draft for discussion as a WG item (and the new charter
> 	  looks like this is ok)
> 	
> 	or
> 
> 	) send a note to the IESG indicating that this is outside the WG charter
> 	  and the IESG should _not_ send it to the WG for consideration when
> 	  the author(s) submit this as an indivdual submission.

I don't understand why you think so.

We can decide not to adopt all manner of documents as working group items, but still offer to review them as individual submissions if they relate to the DNS. This is not materially different from reviewing individual submissions for which the question of wg adoption has not come up.


Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email