RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com> Sun, 25 December 2005 02:11 UTC
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EqLME-0001fU-H6 for dnsext-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:11:34 -0500
Received: from psg.com (mailnull@psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA17127 for <dnsext-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:10:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1EqLH0-000K7q-QL for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:06:10 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on psg.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0
Received: from [129.188.136.8] (helo=motgate8.mot.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>) id 1EqLGz-000K7d-NL for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:06:09 +0000
Received: from il06exr04.mot.com (il06exr04.mot.com [129.188.137.134]) by motgate8.mot.com (8.12.11/Motgate7) with ESMTP id jBP2JdvE019915 for <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:19:39 -0700 (MST)
Received: from ma19exm01.e6.bcs.mot.com (ma19exm01.e6.bcs.mot.com [10.14.33.5]) by il06exr04.mot.com (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jBP2G6s1004641 for <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 20:16:07 -0600 (CST)
Received: by ma19exm01.e6.bcs.mot.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <VPH05P7R>; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:06:07 -0500
Message-ID: <62173B970AE0A044AED8723C3BCF23810C13DEE9@ma19exm01.e6.bcs.mot.com>
From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:06:01 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Hi, To make it easier to review these drafts, I have wdiff'ed them against the RFCs they propose to obsolete. The results are available at http://www.pothole.com/~dee3/. As described below, these are simple update RFCs and I would appreciate people looking at them. Thanks, Donald -----Original Message----- From: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 9:23 PM To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org Subject: RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Hi, As you might guess form the version numbers these drafts have been around for a fairly long time. The previous RFCs were tied to the SIG and KEY RRs only and reference only the old DNSSEC RFCs. The idea is that these updates are part of DNSSEC updating. As far as I know, there isn't any technical difference between the RDATA format in these drafts and in the RFCs they update. There is a minor technical addition in draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2539bis-dhk-06.txt which has an additional pre-defined D-H group taken from IPSEC (and probably there are 1 or more further additional D-H groups specified in IPSEC or other IETF protocols that should be added). ... -- to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Mark Andrews
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Eastlake III Donald-LDE008