IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dnsext] Re: [apps-discuss] [port-srv-reg] New Version Notification for draft-gudmundsson-dnsext-srv-clarify-00

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Fri, 02 July 2010 12:58 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D30623A6872; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 05:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.33
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.33 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.835, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LZdBZeAoUelT; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 05:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A573A6822; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 05:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1OUfhX-0007oL-5l for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:50:39 +0000
Received: from [66.92.146.20] (helo=stora.ogud.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <namedroppers@stora.ogud.com>) id 1OUfhT-0007nh-2n for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:50:35 +0000
Received: from stora.ogud.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stora.ogud.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o62CoVLw037307 for <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 08:50:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from namedroppers@stora.ogud.com)
Received: (from namedroppers@localhost) by stora.ogud.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o62CoTSW037306 for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 08:50:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from namedroppers)
Received: from [128.9.64.64] (helo=vapor.isi.edu) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <touch@isi.edu>) id 1OUNAk-000B7k-Ah for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:03:34 +0000
Received: from [75.214.235.123] (123.sub-75-214-235.myvzw.com [75.214.235.123]) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o61H1gf8014934 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 1 Jul 2010 10:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C2CC9F6.8010503@isi.edu>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:01:42 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
CC: Alfred � <ah@TR-Sys.de>, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports@tools.IETF.ORG, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, Joe Hildebrand <joe.hildebrand@webex.com>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Subject: [dnsext] Re: [apps-discuss] [port-srv-reg] New Version Notification for draft-gudmundsson-dnsext-srv-clarify-00
References: <201006302006.WAA26281@TR-Sys.de> <4C2BBEA8.6070904@isi.edu> <4C2CC7C3.2020005@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4C2CC7C3.2020005@stpeter.im>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3E0482C82727BB735E186D13"
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 66.92.146.20
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>


Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> A point of clarification...
> 
> On 6/30/10 4:01 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
> 
>> "xmpp" is does not have an Assigned Number, and is not being used 'locally', and
>> was never registered with the SRV registry either. Yes, there appear to be a few
>> other uses of SRV records other than for the kind of services indicated in the
>> IANA ports tale or the SRV registry.
> 
> XMPP does have two registered ports (5222 and 5269)

Agreed - neither is listed as "xmpp", though.

"xmpp-client" and "xmpp-server" are both listed in IANA ports and in the DNS SRV
registry, though.

The point above is about using "xmpp" as the service string.

> but the XMPP WG has
> been waiting for the service registry issue to be settled before adding
> the appropriate service name registration to the IANA considerations for
> draft-ietf-xmpp-3920bis, which is currently in WGLC.
> 
> See for instance:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/current/msg00313.html
> 
> Peter
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email