[dnsext] DNSEXT future: Re: Protocol Action: 'Applicability Statement: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm Implementation Status' to Best Current Practice (draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-04.txt)

Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> Thu, 14 March 2013 03:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D54C11E80BF for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cLcaT-DJ0jbW for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp139.ord.emailsrvr.com (smtp139.ord.emailsrvr.com [173.203.6.139]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D4B11E80A4 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp22.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 79455200199 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 23:37:09 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: OK
Received: by smtp22.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: ogud-AT-ogud.com) with ESMTPSA id 05B69200187 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 23:37:08 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130313150516.12865.51363.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 23:37:08 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <73C57154-5F39-4BEB-9213-49621702BF38@ogud.com>
References: <20130313150516.12865.51363.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: dnsext mailing list <dnsext@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Subject: [dnsext] DNSEXT future: Re: Protocol Action: 'Applicability Statement: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm Implementation Status' to Best Current Practice (draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-04.txt)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 03:37:11 -0000

Dear Colleagues, 

The working group has now reached the milestone that all documents on its charter have been advanced by the IESG to RFC-editor or have fallen by the wayside. 
This starts the final countdown on the existence of the working group, we will stay around until the RFC's of the 3 documents in various states of RFC editor processing conclude. 
We have updated the milestones to reflect this. 

	Olafur & Andrew 


On Mar 13, 2013, at 11:05 AM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote:

> The IESG has approved the following document:
> - 'Applicability Statement: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm
>   Implementation Status'
>  (draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-04.txt) as Best Current
> Practice
>