Re: DNSEXT WGLC: Unknown types support

Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com> Mon, 09 September 2002 13:54 UTC

Received: from psg.com (smmsp@psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA01951 for <dnsext-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 09:54:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lserv by psg.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1) id 17oOvS-000PXD-00 for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 06:50:02 -0700
Received: from patan.sun.com ([192.18.98.43]) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 17oOvN-000PWs-00 for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 06:49:57 -0700
Received: from bebop.France.Sun.COM ([129.157.174.15]) by patan.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA13707; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 07:49:54 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from lillen (lillen [129.157.212.23]) by bebop.France.Sun.COM (8.11.6+Sun/8.10.2/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with SMTP id g89DnrA08031; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 15:49:53 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 15:47:35 +0200
From: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>
Reply-To: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>
Subject: Re: DNSEXT WGLC: Unknown types support
To: Rob Austein <sra+namedroppers@hactrn.net>
Cc: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
In-Reply-To: "Your message with ID" <20020823064820.3F8431945@thrintun.hactrn.net>
Message-ID: <Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1031579255.21529.nordmark@bebop.france>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET="US-ASCII"
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,DOUBLE_CAPSWORD version=2.31
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk

> 2) DNS (from RFC 883 through the present day) is case-insensitive but
>    case-preserving for the range of octet values that correspond to
>    the US-ASCII alphabet.  Basicly, this means that DNS preserves case
>    in DNS labels when it's convenient for an implementation to do so,
>    but you can't assume that case has been preserved in any particular
>    DNS name (except, maybe, for the leftmost label of a DNS name).
> 
> 3) I would redirect any follow-up on point (2) to the IDN WG, except
>    that (a) anything that anyone could possibly say on this subject
>    has almost certainly already been said there, and (b) James and
>    Marc would hurt me. :)

Indepedent of the IDN I think the DNS protocol specifications must be
clear on how octets above 128 are processed, since all values are legal
in the domain names as carried in the DNS protocol.

Saying "case insensitive" is IMHO not sufficiently well defined.
Saying that the octet values in the US-ASCII range are compared
case insenstively but other octet values (128-255) are compared
exactly would be a more clear specification.
Similarly for "lower case".

  Erik


--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>